this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Burggit!

1 readers
1 users here now

Ask Burggit!

Ever had a question you wanted to ask? Get an opinion on something?

Well, here's the place to do it! Ask the community pretty much anything.

Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta recently launched Threads in a seemingly rushed state likely aiming to capitalize on Twitter's recent actions, missing features such as Digital Markets Act compliance and ActivityPub support.

Some communities have decided to preemptively defederate them as soon as that gets implemented under fears of them repeating what google did with XMPP by using "Embrace, Expand until no one else can keep up" tactics, while others have claimed those fears are overblown.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In theory good because we absolutely need interoperability between services.

In practice I know this is just meta trying to find a way to harvest data on as many users as possible. I hate that if I interact with a user on threads that likely means Facebook is getting my data which sucks because I want the service to be open but I don't want to subject myself to privacy invasion.

Plus the whole embrace, expand, extinguish thing which I don't think is overblown at all. It's literally how these corporations work by design.