this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Burggit!

1 readers
1 users here now

Ask Burggit!

Ever had a question you wanted to ask? Get an opinion on something?

Well, here's the place to do it! Ask the community pretty much anything.

Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta recently launched Threads in a seemingly rushed state likely aiming to capitalize on Twitter's recent actions, missing features such as Digital Markets Act compliance and ActivityPub support.

Some communities have decided to preemptively defederate them as soon as that gets implemented under fears of them repeating what google did with XMPP by using "Embrace, Expand until no one else can keep up" tactics, while others have claimed those fears are overblown.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think we're safe, but I wouldn't put it past those other lemmy instances to bend to the will of facebook to be facebook compatible.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If this happens, you might see the very first defederation from our end. lol.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Let's be honest, the first podunk blog to associate us with a corporate entity like Facebook is resulting in immediate defederation on Facebook's end. I'm overall cool with defederating any megacorp/government instance tbh.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I'd say let's federate with them

They'll surely love our content!

:^)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In theory good because we absolutely need interoperability between services.

In practice I know this is just meta trying to find a way to harvest data on as many users as possible. I hate that if I interact with a user on threads that likely means Facebook is getting my data which sucks because I want the service to be open but I don't want to subject myself to privacy invasion.

Plus the whole embrace, expand, extinguish thing which I don't think is overblown at all. It's literally how these corporations work by design.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

I'm not seeing any issue with the scorched earth approach of defederating on this one. Facebook isn't a good actor acting on the greater good here. They just seem to be hoping to pick up on Twitters current weakness while they have a nutjob as a CEO. They want market dominance and profits selling user data and ads.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Kinda worrying tbh. With Meta being Meta, I'm afraid they're trying to capitalize the whole Fediverse and farming more data at the same time. I really hope other instances start defederating them. Let them be their own walled garden.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If this happens it's likely we will defederate with them over privacy/security concerns. So, you wouldn't have to worry much about that happening here.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Agreed.

Also I found this to be funny:

"Your thread on Threads has been deleted."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Threadception

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I mean they probably will defederate us first...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They could do embrace extend extinguish

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

New to the whole fediverse thing, but if any instance I'm on federate with Facebook/Meta, I'm leaving that instance.

I was done with Facebook since 2013 and don't plan on ever becoming a product after a decade.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

100% agreed.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Hope we stay federated. As one of the only instances out there. 😎

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I definitely think they pose a threat to the overall health of the Fediverse. Nothing good has ever come from Mark Zuckerberg, and Threads wouldn't be using ActivityPub if he didn't think he could wrangle control of the standard itself from us like the aforementioned ruining of XMPP.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was on FB since college in 2005. I was on when it was college kids only, then high school kids, then our parents. As FB wanted more money I saw the decline each time. Whatever they touch becomes corrupt and unholy. I doubt it would halogen but if Burggit federates with Threads then I'm out. I want to move away from corporate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Tbh there's no way Meta will try to federate with this instance anyway, judging by what kind of content is posted here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

They won't like us. After all, there's no conflict or outrage here for them to profit off of.

load more comments
view more: next ›