this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
176 points (96.3% liked)

Fediverse

27812 readers
409 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Authorized Fetch (also referred to as Secure Mode in Mastodon) was recently circumvented by a stupidly easy solution: just sign your fetch requests with some other domain name.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 126 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

Repeat after me: anything I write on the internet should be treated as public information. If I want to keep any conversation private, I will not post it in a public website.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I agree with you, however there are issues with not just privacy but also authenticity. I should be able to post as me, even in public, and have a way to prove it. Nobody else should be posting information as me, if that makes sense.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

For that, we should start bringing our own private keys to the server, instead of trusting the server to control everything.

And if we start doing that, pretty soon we will end up asking ourselves why do we need the server in the first place, and we will evolve to something like what nostr is doing.

I'm all for it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

...evolve to something like what nostr is doing.

Giving places for cryptobros to wank without being pointed at and laughed at by their betters?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No. You are thinking of Discord.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that 99.44% of nostr is cryptobros.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My friend, you suck at trolling. Can you just let it go?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

When I see nostr users that number more than, say, six who aren't also cryptobros, I'll drop the nostr disrespect. Until then ... 🤷‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

You are doing nothing but a strawman. Lemmy is developed by shit-for-brains tankies, yet there is no denying that their work has brought progress to the distributed web.

Same thing for nostr. Whether you like it or not, nostr "cryptobros" have shown a bunch of things that need improvement on the Fediverse and they are backing their words with actions and working code. You on the other hand have nothing but smug, pretentious bullshit to throw around.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Again, when you can show me a cryptobro concentration lower than 99.44%, I'll take nostr seriously. And when you can show it not turning into a Hellhole worse than Xhitter and Farcebook combined because of the very philosophy underpinning it, then I'll think it's actually worth looking at. (Hint: this is not possible.)

Until then I'll call it what it is: a place for cryptobros to wank to their faux-libertarian fantasies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

And yet has overwhelmingly cryptobros.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Do you realize that you are fighting against an open Internet?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I am mocking cryptobro fantasies and their favoured lines of communication.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not really, you're saying if people you dislike are associated with something then you automatically write it off without understanding it. That's self mockery.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

Whatever you say, child. Buh-bye.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but that's already solved on the fediverse by using HTTP Signatures and isn't related to Authorized Fetch.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I meant to say generally, for folks that might read this comment and think problems surrounding the platform and security are solved.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Clear sign every post using a third-party application. Make your public keys known far and wide. Authenticity solved.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

And now we're dealing with key management instead

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

You always need key management if you have decentralized authentication.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

You always need key management if you have decentralized authentication.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Seriously. Bobthenazi could just go to an aligned server and make an account Bobthenotzi and boom -- perfectly able to follow whoever he wants.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

One more reason to argue that we should drop the idea of "aligned" servers and that we are moving to a future where it is better to charge (small) amounts from everyone instead of depending on (large) donations from a few.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ideally, a distributed fediverse wouldn't need much in terms of donations because it's a bunch of small instances instead of a few huge ones.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Not the point. The point that instances that are open for everyone will be open for bad actors as well.

If the mere act of signing up to an instance requires a small payment, you are automatically preventing the absolute majority of spammers, "spray and pray" scammers and channer trolls.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

To add a bit of important nuance to this idea (particularly how this argument comes up with regards to threads). This does not apply to legal rights over your content. That is to say, of course you should treat any information you put out there as out of your control with regards to access but if somebody tries to claim legal rights over your content they are probably breaking the law.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Right. Publicly available does not mean in public domain. But the issue here is not of copyright, but merely of gated access.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Totally. I'm just trying to bring it up whenever I see folks having this discussion because some people don't seem to make the distinction. Worries me that some are so willing to cede that big social will illegally hoover up our data and there's nothing we can do about it.