this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
847 points (97.4% liked)

News

22612 readers
3944 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A drug infamously touted by Donald Trump has been linked to nearly 17,000 Covid deaths in a new scientific study.

Researchers say that the anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine was prescribed to patients during the first wave of Covid-19 “despite the absence of evidence documenting its clinical benefits.”

The French study estimated that 16,990 patients in the US, France, Belgium, Italy, Spain and Turkey may have died as a result of the drug.

The study has been published in the February issue of Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.

Researchers say the data used comes from a study published in the Nature scientific journal, which reported that there was an 11 per cent increase in mortality rate linked to the drug’s prescription.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 45 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Even if 10% of those people took it because he told them to, that’s 1700 deaths on his head.

I haven’t even killed one person.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Given they're still alive, their k/d is undefined

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Is that a math joke? 😋

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

or -inf if you aproach the limit to 0 from the other side of the number axis.

So they either become an archangel in heaven or archdemon in hell. It’s 50/50 but either way you become something great, so remember kids, don’t kill anybody.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Also remember - don't die.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Assuming x∈ℝ, x/0 is undefined iff x=0. For all x>0, x/0 = ∞.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

1st, I doubt he cares or even thinks about it.

2nd, if we’re talking about his actions leading to deaths, I’d say this one is his top-performer (5/10/2018):

https://x.com/atomicanalyst/status/994696175575068672?s=46&t=g3yM8UdEINqcLyXIxWs-lg

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You'll never make it as a conservative.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

That’s the nicest thing anyone has ever said to me. ;)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I haven’t even killed one person.

Have you even made the effort?

People are so lazy these days.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, I’m a millennial. I can’t afford a gun because I buy so much avocado toast and coffee.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Heck, when I was a kid, people were buying rocks with googly eyes on them. You can't kill a person with a rock if you just put in a little effort! Have to explain everything to kids these days.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

As a millennial, I my genx/bb father never stuck around, so “throwing” is only something I can do with garbage—in the correct receptacle, compost, trash, cans, plastic, glass. Don’t tell me it goes to the same spot, I can’t hear you with my AirPods in. La la la

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's no such thing as an innocent billionaire.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

No one gets to $1bn without being a total cunt. It’s impossible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Ignorance is bliss

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

If you're counting indirect deaths, then you've probably been responsible for someone's death and not known it. (Edit: If it's not obvious, this is supposed to be a bit tongue in cheek)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's a big difference between the kind of causality where you cause someone to leave their house 5 minutes later than they would have, ultimately resulting in a fatal car crash that wouldn't have happened otherwise, and people dying because they did something you encouraged them to do

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Yes, in hindsight, I don't think "responsible" was the right word.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I've always wondered about that. I worked at walmart for years. Lots of alcohol. Did I help a drunk driving death? Or who knows what else. Lots of kitchen knives and shit like that. What about hammers? Lots of stuff I sold could be used to kill a person.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If you sold a lot of alcohol, you've almost certainly contributed to a death. Between drunk driving, stupid alcohol decisions, and cancer, alcohol is pretty much the most dangerous drug we have in terms of societal damage (because its usage is so widespread).

I probably shouldn't have used the word "responsible", though. If person A miles up the road was driving slightly over the speed limit they might make it through an orange light that they otherwise would have missed. This might place a new car at the front of the queue with person B, and this person may then get hit by a driver that missed a red light, leading to their death. While the chain of events ultimately led to their death, and if Person A had driven the speed limit then person B would probably still be alive, I don't think you can say person A is responsible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is that saying aging, stress, etc somehow create alcohol in our bodies? If true, maybe we should be worried about futurama-like robots creating a matrix-like situation!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Some tiny amount is always naturally created. That is called "endogenous ethanol production" and is part of the normal methabolic process.

The paper goes into ho the amount produced fluctuates with many factors (including the ones you mentioned) and the less is created, the more one carves for drinking alcohol.

I find the idea funny that all humans (among other mammals) are basically perma microdosing alcohol.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

You most certainly sold alcohol to alcoholics, which contributed to their slow deaths, but that isn't your fault, because if you wouldn't have sold it to them, they would have gotten it elsewhere. That's how addiction works.