this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
296 points (82.5% liked)

World News

38977 readers
2212 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

(Reuters) - Russian President Vladimir Putin, running for a new six-year term in an election that his opponents say is a parody of democracy, said on Tuesday that past U.S. elections had been rigged by postal voting.

"In the United States, previous elections were falsified through postal voting ... they bought ballots for $10, filled them out, and threw them into mailboxes without any supervision from observers, and that's it," Putin said, without providing evidence.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

So you're just going to ignore the weaponization of the word across the political spectrum to the point where it's actually a pointless accusation?

If you think I was JAQing, I'll dispell that right now by giving the brief history for you and others. The origin of the term Tanky is from British marxists who used it as a term to seperate themselves from other British marxists that supported the brutal crushing of a worker revolt in Hungary, and has since turned into a term (by, for, and directed at) leftists that unequivocally support totalitarianism coming from a leftist perspective. Some leftists have also expanded that meaning to be people that identify with Marxist-Leninism. Others still use it to degrade people that want a scientific analysis of the successes and failures of other socialist projects. The alt-right uses it to disparage anyone with leftist sympathies. Liberals picked it up and use it to disparage people left of liberals.

Sorry for trying to have a common understanding I guess.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes, we're going to ignore it, tankie apologist. Because it doesn't exist. We know what we're talking about when we use the word.

Don't want to be called a tankie? Well, don't be one. It's that simple.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Common language is essential to understanding for a conversation to move forward. Case in point, I want to know what the USSR did well and I want to know what their failures were, so we can make an attempt at a better socialist experiment and prevent a Stalin from cropping up. An important part of that is seeing past the decades of propaganda and loaded language in the coverage of Western media. Seeking that kind of knowledge is known as scientific socialism. More than a few people call that "tanky", despite not fitting the definition of "unequivocally supports totalitarianism".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Looking for the truth on the USSR and Russia's socialist period is absolutely fine. What I don't want to see here or anywhere is people making excuses for genocide under the pretext that the atrocities have been committed by reds or ex-reds. That shit is unacceptable.

The word tankie can absolutely be misattributed, yes. But it's not a significant problem. The criticism mostly comes from good-faith, actual leftists, who have nothing to gain from smearing campaigns and know what they're talking about.

The existence of people on Lemmy (aka tankies) cheering when innocents die because they happen to be born in the wrong country is revulsing, and a bigger issue.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I consider it's misuse a much bigger problem than actual tankies. Tankies are a vast minority in leftist spaces, even on the Internet. They are a totally irrelevant faction to anything, especially national politics. I suppose we won't see eye to eye here.

On the rest, I absolutely agree. I'm the active mod of [email protected] and our top rule is no genocide denial. Every comment I've removed on the subject has been in support of Israel killing civilians, so I don't think it has anything to do with tankies in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

If you hadn't replied to PugJesus, this would have remained a comment among many others, and reduced the visibility of antitankie comments. Now, you've made this a whole thread.

Just let it slide. Don't jump to their defense. Let the actual tankies marginalize themselves into oblivion and you'll help solve 2 Lemmy problems at once: tankism, and abusive antitankism (since there won't be a need for genuine antitankism anymore).

What could have been a quick "aye, fuck tankies" is creating entire threads, and makes us talk about it.