this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
394 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

58922 readers
3574 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
394
Sam Altman Says AI Using Too Much Energy, Will Require Breakthrough Energy Source (futurism.com)
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
240 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"There's no way to get there without a breakthrough," OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said, arguing that AI will soon need even more energy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 96 points 9 months ago (4 children)

The human brain uses about 20W. Maybe AI needs to be more efficient instead?

[–] [email protected] 57 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Perfect let's use human brains as CPUs then. Not the whole brain just the unused bits.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I've seen that film

[–] [email protected] 46 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's what matrix would've been if the studios didn't think people would too dumb to get it, so we ended with the nonsense about batteries.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They also thought we wouldn't understand how Switch could be a woman in the matrix but a man in the real world. So they just made the character a butch woman because apparently that's easier somehow. So many little changes like this were made.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Holy fuck now her name makes so much more sense. God dammit, why are we so fucking stuck up as a society that we couldn’t even keep that

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Tbf that society was a while ago now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't think it's gotten better, and honestly they oversimplify even more today. For some reason

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Nah, that would absolutely not be something the studio would have a problem with these days.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Flubber!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago

We use all of our brain. Well, some of us try to anyway.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I would love it (if there exists a FOSS variant of that) imagine being able to run a LLM, or even LAM in your head,

wait…

🤔

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

FOSS Neuralink

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That would require a revolutionary discovery in material science and hardware.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And yet we have brains. This brute force approach to machine learning is quite effective but has problems scaling. So, new energy sources or new thinking?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

We just run the AI for a gazillion epochs and then it's ~~overfitted~~ evolved intelligence. Thanks Darwin we did it again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

It'd be way easier to just grow brains instead