114
The descriptivist's dilemma (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

spoileralt text: A two panel comic. In the first panel there are two buttons labeled "I don't believe in prescriptivism" and "'Literally' cannot mean 'figuratively'". A finger hovers between the buttons. In the second panel, the finger's owner is sweating and wiping his brow, unable to decide.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago

Take the utilitarian position: the word "literally" is more useful if it is distinct from the word "figuratively", but in most other cases descriptivist definitions are more useful.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I take the pessimist position, which is similar to yours, but I still hate people who don't do what I want.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

I just get annoyed when people use it in ambiguous context and it creates confusion.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Counterpoint: raw utility is overrated and goofy vibes are much more enjoyable.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

This is why English is such a linguistically fucked language now lol

[-] tigeruppercut 1 points 5 months ago

How is English any more or less linguistically fucked than any other natural language?

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
114 points (93.2% liked)

Linguistics Humor

1006 readers
1 users here now

Do you like languages and linguistics ? Here is for having fun about it


Share this community: [[email protected]](/c/[email protected])


Serious Linguistics community: [email protected]


Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS