Україна Ukraine

3 readers

1 users here now

Все про Україну Everything about Ukraine

founded 1 year ago

Moscow confirms Putin interview with Tucker Carlson (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Kremlin said interview was granted because Carlson was neither pro-Russian or pro-Ukrainian, unlike, it said, other western media

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

TD never criticized their god-king

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I mean in an inverse or parallel way. Just replace the names.

The “interview” is just cover.

My bet is Soros is vetting AOC for Biden’s running mate.

Once AOC kisses the ring, and likely commits a crime (or other misdeeds) on Soros’s orders (to serve as puppet-string kompromat for Soros’s plans), Soros will give the blessing for Biden to announce AOC as his VP running mate.

Then, just imagine a 2028 Presidential bid from AOC (win or lose in ‘24)…

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

There's a long history of the Kremlin using kompromat.

"Putin's spokesman said Wednesday that the Russian government does not gather compromising material, or kompromat, on political rivals, despite a well-documented history of such behavior." (the rest of the article is worth the read)

"There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material, on the future president, collected – the document says – from Trump’s earlier 'non-official visits to Russian Federation territory'."

About the same leak and also worth reading

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I’m not saying this never occurs. I studied russia/easten Europe for years and am very familiar with the kremlin’s history. Of course it happens. It’s one of their bread and butter tactics.

I’m saying that the string of events this person is theorizing is cut whole cloth from speculation. I think we can both acknowledge that.

Just because something “makes sense” doesn’t mean it’s true.