Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
And that's the other thing, why Minnesota? They have my name and email, that's not too surprising: I'm well aware of how easy that information is to come by. But they couldn't be bothered to look up what state I live in and realize that it would be a waste of time to target me?
Sending emails isn't free, even if you have a mail server or a botnet to do it for you, it still takes time and computing power and bandwidth. So why wouldn't you try to whittle down the list as much as possible?
It seems more likely that the replies might be genuine, but the message that prompted them wasn't.
It's a safe bet that the staff at these offices wouldn't have the time to verify that the message actually came from one of their constituents, especially if they're receiving them in bulk. I'd expect the replies to be mostly automated anyway, but the messages would still affect their internal statistics.
If someone's using a mass email campaign to try to sway members of Congress, that's really fucking concerning to me.