Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
You can destroy your content yet. If you surround it with the right NEW contextual information, you can make its value zero or negative. You can incentivize them to remove it, in which case best case they don't do so and reap whatever harm your new layer of context provides, or worst case they acquiesce to the deletion since it's now in their best interests.
The trick is to find this content which, through append-only, nullifies or inverts your content's value.
Which might be unsolvable. But I suspect it's not. Some kind of GANN setup should eventually be able to find a way to nullify any message's value as training data. Sort of like you can add notes to music to make it wrong.
Probably requires astronomical amounts of computing power, or perhaps a head start with AI. But just because they have all the things you wrote, and can't be deprived of them, doesn't mean the situation's hopeless.