this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
2404 points (99.8% liked)

196

16488 readers
1831 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk if you don’t think LGBTQ+ folks deserve equal rights or think that social programs are “too generous” I’m not really interested in how nuanced the rest of you is.

Not saying that’s your beliefs specifically. Just that enough of us are actively harmed by the results of conservative laws and governance that I’m not really interested in knowing the nuanced part of someone who supports those policies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Of course everyone deserve equal rights, and yes, the social programs could be infinitely better if we put even more resources towards them.

However, with recent internet restrictions, censorship, and identity politics, we're also actively being harmed by the left.

That doesn't mean what the people on the right are doing is any good either, I'm just saying it's not good to lump everyone into these black and white categories. It creates the weird tribalism we see here.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the radical left rolling out programs like 5 eyes. The radical left that makes it legal for corporations to throw cameras everywhere and deploy facial tracking software. The left who deregulated everything till credit card companies are allowed to determine who can access their money and what you're allowed to spend it on. That radical left sure does love rolling out censorious police state stuff.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

-5 eyes was started in 1946 by democrats

-im not sure what you're talking about with the cameras, but look at the UK, that surveillance state was started with 5 eyes (the "labour party")

-if money is the topic, the left wants to create a centralized digital currency to do exactly what you're talking about with credit cards

-censorious police state "stuff" happened during covid, perpetuated by the left

Remember net neutrality?

I'd like to point out though, that the right doesn't make great strides either, but I don't need to give examples of that to people in this thread.

A 2 party system is hot garbage, and it's about being as divisive as possible to pump up your side.

It's like a Coke vs Pepsi advertising war

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those parties aren't left wing...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If Democrats and the Labour party (socialist democrat) aren't left, then what is?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the Democrats are a primary party in a military cult empire that indoctrinates children with flag rites and coups every government that dares to call itself socialist. I'm guessing you're part of that military cult and thus don't understand how insane it seems from the outside.

There are left elements, that sandy man seems to flirt with Democratic socialism, although not very strongly. It doesn't seem like he has much power though.

Labor in the UK has thoroughly remade itself after Thatcher with the new labour movement which distanced themselves from their unionist and socialist roots. They now don't have any particularly leftist policies, although they are less right than the Tories obviously.

In Australia labor did a similar thing after the USA couped our only elected socialist government and replaced the labour leader with a CIA groomed dude.

The right is utterly ascendant in global politics and has been since the rise of neoliberal economics under Reagan and Thatcher. That power is beginning to wane, but don't confuse being left of "we should hunt the homeless for sport" with being a leftist government. Leftism isn't when shouting slurs gets you tutted at, it's Democratic businesses and worker owned collectives, nationalised infrastructure, anti imperialism, open boarders, welfare above the poverty line, universal recognition of human dignity etc.

In Australia the most mainstream leftist party would be the greens who hold at most 1 to 3 seats out of 150 regularly. Similarly in the UK I am given to understand. There are more radical parties but they're even more marginalised.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Hah "military cult empire" - that's a great name for the people/parties you're referring to.

The UK's labour party did all of that reforming in the mid nineties though, but I see what you're trying to get at with the coup's and neoliberal economic movements.

I'd really like to see what you described (the definition you gave for actually being "left") - in action. Unfortunately, democracies are inherently not very secure (tech may be able to solve some of this), because of other countries and bad actors. Open borders would make this even harder.

Would there even be a government in this situation? Or would this be more akin to a socialist technocracy?

Do you have any examples of any that have done it yet? Without centralizing any sort of power?