this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
734 points (98.8% liked)

Funny

6745 readers
1158 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I have never found items advocating violence... What kinds of items are those?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Maybe a bat with nails through it. A sword makes me want to swing it around. Idk if that's close enough for advocating violence.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

That's great, I'll order it!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Maybe a bat with nails through it.

Man, those Negan cosplayers would have it rough if Amazon decided to not sell them said equipment /s

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

I bought a printer off Amazon. That thing definitely advocates violence.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Get a Brother, brother (or sister), they actually work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I see you’ve ordered HP

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Likely it is something that is critical of some political ideology.

So let's say there is a shirt that says "Real women have a uterus", that is advocating violence against trans women because it is promoting spoken violence towards trans women to claim/advocate that they are not "real" women.

Other examples would be "Free Palestine", "Palestine doesn't exist", "All Lives matter", "Jan 6th was a peaceful protest", "No cop lives matter", "Hitler had some good ideas", "Pants up, dont shoot", etc.

I tried to include examples from both sides, but there are so many more examples from one side than the other...

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I would say most of those examples don't advocate violence. Don't get me wrong, they're controversial, but they aren't immediately calling for violence.

Roger Stone posting a picture of a judge with crosshairs next to her head - that was directly advocating violence.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

We aren't discussing meeting the legal definition of advocating violence, we are talking about what someone considers advocating violence. Where the line is drawn between free speech and violence is subjective based on the ideology of the individual.

It is more likely the OP example is using the subjective definition than the legal definition because they are complaining to Amazon and posted it online.