this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
347 points (96.0% liked)

World News

38531 readers
1904 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • US Adm. John Aquilino said China's military is building up at a rate not seen since World War II.
  • That puts it on the path to meeting its goal of being ready to invade Taiwan by 2027, he said.
  • Aquilino, the outgoing head of the US Indo-Pacific Command, urged Washington to accelerate military development.

China's rapid military build-up is more expansive than anything seen since World War II, which means it's on track with its 2027 goal to be ready for a Taiwan invasion, said US Navy Adm. John Aquilino.

"All indications point to the PLA meeting President Xi Jinping's directive to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027," Aquilino wrote in a testimony to the US Armed Services House Committee.

"Furthermore, the PLA's actions indicate their ability to meet Xi's preferred timeline to unify Taiwan with mainland China by force if directed," added the admiral, the outgoing head of the US Indo-Pacific Command.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 48 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Maybe one day they can attain the freedom status of the exceptional USA.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

To be honest, that graph is a bit worrying especially if you look at PPP. I'm not saying "China will build more aircraft carriers than the US" or some such nonsense. I'm saying there is no point going to 300 bil if you don't want to fight the US. India is their other closest rival.

I'm not sure they would succeed, but I'm worried they might try.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago

The thing that's always so misleading about these numbers is that everything costs more in the US to begin with. A lot of that expense is just for US labor, which costs more per person than at least most countries. The graph is a lot more reasonable when you do [% of gdp] (https://www.statista.com/statistics/266892/military-expenditure-as-percentage-of-gdp-in-highest-spending-countries/)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think they're probably more worried about the us invading them. We're the ones who've been invading countries most in the past 100 years, not china.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Their own rhetoric says otherwise. The whole saber-rattling thing brings people closer to war, not peace.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

USA should invade USA and spread democracy there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

April 12

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

KSA being on this chart is an imposter because they can't even defeat the Houthis by themselves lmao.

All that funding is to buy and bribe the US military to maintain their own bases in the country to keep themselves secure.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

The graph says "expenditure", not "quality"

Which seems appropriate

Like they are doing for the sports, spend billions to be still irrelevant

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm all against populist and authoritarian regimes, but taking them out of the table, fuck USA.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

How dare they defend Taiwanese freedom, disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

They also funded and supported Juntas all over my continent