this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
153 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15910 readers
295 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I heard that they literally have bombs in the buildings already that can be set off. Not sure how true.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 7 months ago

Probably not true at all.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't know that I'd believe that, but it also wouldn't surprise me.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (2 children)

i think there's a defcon talk from a decade ago about what it would actually take to have a "self-destruct button" like in movies just for some servers or hard drives and i don't think any capitalist would justify the expense when they can have somebody else pay for aerial bombardment or some shit.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Sure, absolutely. But, otoh, if it's the US Military behind it, then money's no object. My initial thought on something like a self destruct would be that if I could use it so could my enemies... But, that was also my concern about massive data collection and surveillance states, and that didn't stop them so...😅🤷‍♂️

Edit: but yeah aerial bombardment is what I would expect.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Pressing the comically large self-destruct button, but nothing happens because Raytheon cut corners and skimped on the fuse

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Sort of, there's a lot that can go wrong with long term self-destruct systems that mean that it's unrealistically expensive or a huge risk to the thing you're trying to "protect".

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They were.....ahhhh...they were 'weakened' by the previous earthquake. All those mini flashes and free fall you saw on video was just coincidential office fires that ravaged the building from another seperate event. Oh and the recent new owner that took out comically massive insurance policies on the building with a very unusual terrorism, war, and acts of God exception clause was purely coincidential.