this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
236 points (97.2% liked)

World News

39174 readers
3019 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I don't know about Chilean economies of scale. The article you linked was about privatization of utilities and the economies of scale in that sector.

What I do know is that in the US suburbs, my total water costs are much lower than when I lived in the city. Running clean water pipes to homes and sewage pipes is extraordinarily expensive.

Flint Michigan is looking at $600m to replace pipes to 43k homes. That's $14k per home and then they still have to pay for water and sewer.

The average cost for a well and sceptic is $12k and then it's free. Average water bill is $1400 a year for urban residents.

If combining utilities was cost effective, my neighborhood would have done it when it was built. It's the same with gas lines.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

yep, you're entirely right. for your area, it's more effective to run wells for each person. the frustrating part being that, it implies that the city has been designed so, so badly, that individuals can't actually share resources, without the per capita price going up if they do so.

even without depopulation, that's a huge governmental failure. if individuals are having to run all their own utility setups and infrastructure, is that even a "city"? it sounds more like rural living but it's all vaguely connected. presumably as a result of this low density, you have higher ongoing costs elsewhere? i.e commutes to work, cost of food, etc

if not, then it could be one of those taxpayer-subsidised things, where it feels cheaper for each resident, but the reality is that someone else is paying for it. i'm not good at wording what i mean in this case, but i will pass you to this video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Nw6qyyrTeI) to show it instead, he does a better job of explaining what i'm talking about

anyhow... that's crazy! it's entirely the thing i'm worried about seeing replicated large scale as a result of a reduction in population

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=7Nw6qyyrTeI

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Interesting. My water bill is around $800 per year, and that includes sewerage service. That well would take 15 years to reach cost parity, and that's leaving out the septic system.

And wells are decidedly not free after installation, if my parents' experience is anything to go by. (Nothing catastrophic, to they just had to pay for pump maintenance occasionally.)