Based Denmark
NonCredibleDefense
A community for your defence shitposting needs
Rules
1. Be nice
Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.
2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes
If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.
3. Content must be relevant
Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.
4. No racism / hatespeech
No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.
5. No politics
We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.
6. No seriousposting
We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.
7. No classified material
Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.
8. Source artwork
If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.
9. No low-effort posts
No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.
10. Don't get us banned
No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.
11. No misinformation
NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.
Other communities you may be interested in
Banner made by u/Fertility18
What's the context of this?
Czechia gave 800k artillery shells to Ukraine, Denmark donated their entire stock.
Afaik Czechia identified 800k shells available on the world market (a lot from Turkey) and they are looking for partners to buy them for Ukraine.
Thank you! I'm Czech, so now I feel embarrassed for not knowing about it.
Your president should join your country's fantastic gay porn industry! I'm a big fan. :D
Wait so are they playing Blackjack or Texas Holdem?
If they're playing Blackjack, one of those cards should be the other way. If they're playing Holdem we'd need more information to tell if going all in would be reasonable.
actually, they're playing cards.
Oh thanks, that clarifies everything!
They are playing Hold'em, but my guess is that Denmark doesn't expect to be called on this move.
Ace King suited is fun to yolo with.
The result is dead orcs so all in is quite reasonable.
If this is pre flop and you're going all in, just a pair of pocket twos has better odds of winning than AK suited.
No, it's almost exactly a coin flip. AK has so many outs, flush potential, straight potential. The pair of twos has exactly two cards out of the whole deck to improve.
Almost exactly, but not quite. Difference is a pair of twos is already the winning hand. The AK HAS to have one of the other aces or kings drop, or get a straight or a flush. Twos will win without any help.
Odds of deuces winning on an all in pre-flop are 52% to 48% against a big slick, but that's exactly the type of odds that make sure casinos always make money gambling. "Not quite a coin flip"
The flush potential puts it over the edge. Just use a calculator yourself. It's 49.77% (in favor of AK) vs 49.60%.
Well shit. Seems right.
Funny enough, if one of the pocket pair of 2s is the same suite as the suited AK, odds once again marginally tip over to the 2s side
"My friend, you bow to no one."
How much stock does Denmark even have?