Leate_Wonceslace

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

For every cause, there exists some possible circumstance such that one or more individuals having a miscalculation would benefit that cause.

Proof: Take desired result R. Assume there exists some person P who is opposed to R. Let there be some action that P can take such that R becomes impossible. If there are no downsides to this action, then R will only occur if P makes a miscalculation. ⬜

Thus, if your maxim holds, then there is no such thing as a good cause.

A discriminant that labels all causes as "bad" is not useful.

Therefore, your maxim does not serve as a useful discriminant.

QED

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Maybe you should save this for the day after the election friend. People being delusional about how good Kamala will be is actually really good for us strategically at the moment.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

I'm pretty sure the moon was always there.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago

Stuffing is like the only good place for raisins.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Go to the breaker box and pull the big one labeled "main". Then call the fire department.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Imagine having your head this far up your own ass.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Was this released in 2022? No? Why does the tittle say "already", then?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I think the meaning is fairly obvious; an imperfect ally is better than an all-out enemy. If you wanna do politics, you need to learn who you can safely ally with, who your actual friends are, and who will always be your enemy.

Edit: oh wow, look at all those comments on ML. I wonder why this person would object to lesser evil rhetoric favoring the democrats.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

The person running for office is a politician? Say it isn't so!

I wonder why this article is being released before the election, rather than later when the cooling of support isn't extremely likely to lead to a strategic disadvantage? 🤔 Oh well, it's probably just a coincidence. 🤷‍♂️ Definitely no ulterior motives here. 👍

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago
 

"Every previous president would have ended it by now."

"Biden literally couldn't do worse."

446
irrulevant (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
 
view more: next ›