this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
146 points (98.7% liked)

Baldur's Gate 3

6246 readers
140 users here now

All things BG3!

Baldur’s Gate 3 is a story-rich, party-based RPG set in the universe of Dungeons & Dragons, where your choices shape a tale of fellowship and betrayal, survival and sacrifice, and the lure of absolute power. (Website)

Spoilers

If your post contains any possible spoilers, please:

Thank you!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

When not even the companies take these massive documents seriously, it's clear that we need to rethink how this all works.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I don't mind these contacts / TOS. But the courts have to separate fixed contaycts open to the public vs. negotiated contracts in private.

Fixed contacts, which do not allow for negotiations, should not be able to use individual arbitration clause.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

True. It doesn't even state what happens if I have a pre-established eldritch pact going before signing this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Agreed, sneaking crap like this in agreements should be grounds for nullifying them since it shows the companies don't have the expectation that people who click the agree button have 20 pages of deliberately obtuse legal junk.

That's not even mentioning the shitty condescending attitude of "lol look at this wacky stuff we do....but we're reserving the right to financially destroy you based on the terms hidden in this document alone"

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm pretty sure they do it to prove copyright infringement should another dev/publisher copy and paste their exact agreement into their game or service, like how cartographers put fake cities/landmarks on a map to easily prove someone copied their work. I remember an AWS service having a "zombie apocalypse" clause at some point.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Seems rude to ban warlock in the eula, but still put them in game...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know someone read the entire EULA to find this and consulted their attorney to see if it could be upheld in court.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Also the attorney at Larian that had to approve the TOS.

"...you want to put what in there now?"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I mean that’s a pretty legit clause.