It's interesting that the last two candidates ended up being the two extremes.
Programming.dev Meta
Welcome to the Programming.Dev meta community!
This is a community for discussing things about programming.dev itself. Things like announcements, site help posts, site questions, etc. are all welcome here.
Links
Credits
I'm not sure about that, they were the simplest options. I feel like the order of elimination was related to how long the explanation was. People like things simple.
also note you will notice some numbers in the tables not being the same round from round, some people voted for the same option multiple times which means I couldnt give them a second or third choice since they only did 1 or 2
What happens to the vote if you step their 2nd and 3rd choice to less restrictive or more restrictive? (depending on the starting side)
As in set the invalid votes to be one of the other options? Theres only 4 invalid votes from limited being eliminated and 0 from silenced so wouldn't affect final results (difference between open and closed is 22)
1st choice counts makes it seem like people might have preferred the 3rd option. Anyway, I was an invalid vote is why I asked.
Nice, I like this way of counting votes. I doubt blocking them will make a difference since the instagram crowd probably has a low overlap with the programming crowd anyway. However, it remains to be seen just how active threads users will be in the fediverse anyway.