this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
451 points (98.3% liked)

News

23284 readers
4452 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Move follows Alabama’s recent killing of death row inmate Kenneth Smith using previously untested method

Three of the largest manufacturers of medical-grade nitrogen gas in the US have barred their products from being used in executions, following Alabama’s recent killing of the death row inmate Kenneth Smith using a previously untested method known as nitrogen hypoxia.

The three companies have confirmed to the Guardian that they have put in place mechanisms that will prevent their nitrogen cylinders falling into the hands of departments of correction in death penalty states. The move by the trio marks the first signs of corporate action to stop medical nitrogen, which is designed to preserve life, being used for the exact opposite – killing people.

The green shoots of a corporate blockade for nitrogen echoes the almost total boycott that is now in place for medical drugs used in lethal injections. That boycott has made it so difficult for death penalty states to procure drugs such as pentobarbital and midazolam that a growing number are turning to nitrogen as an alternative killing technique.

Now, nitrogen producers are engaging in their own efforts to prevent the abuse of their products. The march has been led by Airgas, which is owned by the French multinational Air Liquide.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 111 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Nitrogen hypoxia sounds like one of the best ways to die, without pain or panic, but I completely understand why no company wants to be the supplier of the means of executing people. Small volume, small profits, extreme controversy. What’s to want there?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sure. If it was done correctly and we could trust the justice system to not kill innocent people. However they figured out the cruelest way to do it and SCOTUS ruled we have to kill innocent people even if all the evidence says they're innocent because it might hurt the court's reputation of they back down.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (4 children)

SCOTUS ruled we have to kill innocent people even if all the evidence says they're innocent because it might hurt the court's reputation of they back down.

I'm not familiar with this. Is this something that actually happened?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I believe they're referencing this:

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that state prisoners have no constitutional right to present new evidence in federal court to support their claims that they were represented at trial and on appeal in state courts by unqualified or otherwise deficient lawyers. The vote was 6-to-3, along ideological lines.

. . .

On Monday Thomas wrote the majority decision hollowing out that 2012 ruling on behalf of the court's new six-justice conservative super majority.

He said that federal courts may not hear "new evidence" obtained after conviction to show how deficient the trial or appellate lawyer in state court was. To allow such evidence to be presented in federal court, he said, "encourages prisoners to sandbag state courts," depriving the states of "the finality that is essential to both the retributive and deterrent function of criminal law."

. . .

Writing for the three dissenters, Justice Sonia Sotomayor called the decision "perverse," and "illogical." The Sixth Amendment "guarantees criminal defendants the right to effective assistance of counsel at trial," she said. "Today, however, the court hamstrings the federal courts' authority to safeguard that right."

NPR Source

This is so from 2022.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago

yes more then once. Most recently the supreme court ruled you can't bring new evidence to an areal. Why? because it would undermine the state right to be sure of their decision. Also note that the most successful way to win an appeal on a criminal case was to bring new evidence that showed your defense did not do their job or the prosecution withheld evidence that showed your innocence.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

It's called "finality".

The idea that it's more Important that the process is followed and then stops at some point than that justice is achieved.

Same reason they barred introduction of new evidence when appealing from state court to federal, giving potentially corrupt state courts full power to block exculpatory evidence to deny someone justice because the federal courts must uphold the verdict if the evidence which was accepted indicates guilt under the state law. Same thing if the prosecutor knows of evidence of innocence and withholds or, or if the evidence only turns up after the trial. You get only one chance and then you're screwed.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Shinn V Ramirez, 2022.

They were arguing ineffective counsel post conviction because evidence wasn't submitted that could have shown Ramirez was innocent. Lower courts agreed, citing previous SCOTUS rulings. SCOTUS decided federal courts must be bound by the original evidence only.

Money Quote -

Two of those costs are particularly relevant here. First, a federal order to retry or release a state prisoner overrides the State’s sovereign power to enforce “societal norms through criminal law.” Calderon v. Thompson, 523 U. S. 538, 556.

Second, federal intervention imposes significant costs on state criminal justice systems. See, e.g., Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U. S. 72, 90. Pp. 6–8.

(Separated for clarity)

Personally I love how they say we need to respect a state's right to enforce social norms. With the death penalty. Because those are equivalent things. Betty doesn't like to mow her lawn. She likes to let her neighbor Lucy do it. Off to the chair for her! Okay jokes aside what they mean is their power to make laws, enforce laws, and have a court system.

And then it's too expensive? Really? I'm not going to be surprised when we end up with the purge only instead of being everywhere it's actually when the air raid siren goes off during yard time at the prison.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Media witnesses said Smith appeared conscious for about ten minutes. He shook and writhed for about two minutes on the gurney, followed by about five minutes of heavy breathing.

https://www.npr.org/2024/01/25/1226936713/alabama-execution-kenneth-smith

[–] [email protected] 81 points 8 months ago (8 children)

Because they did in the worst way possible. All Alabama had to do was flood a sealed room with nitrogen and the execution would have been fairly "unremarkable". Instead they forced a has mask on Smith that required his cooperation to function properly, didn't have a one-way valve to remove exhaled gas, causing CO2 to build up in the tiny mask.

A haircut is also a painless and quick procedure, but that doesn't mean your barber can't be incompetent and totally fuck up your scalp.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Especially if the American Barber Association has a rule that none of its members may participate in the haircut; and scissor manufacturers all refuse to sell to you. So you end up having it done by a random person who doesn't mind ignoring what every barber says, using a pair of rusty scissors the sherrif was able to find at a garage sale.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

Maybe at that point you shouldn’t cut the damn hair

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

That's the thing and something I bring up with other engineers all the time. The medical community decided to not help and the result is the government can't do it very well making it harder and harder to justify the practice. Engineers however continue to work on military tech.

We need to organize and blacklist those that help make weapons.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Yeah you need to be in a chamber where your exhaled co2 is so immediately diluted that you get no feedback from it. I believe the current attempts used normal medical masks

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (5 children)

If "right to die" laws become more of a thing, this would be the most compassionate way of doing a home suicide kit. I wonder if the manufacturers would oppose that as well, or only executions.

Like you said, there's not much in it for them either way.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It sounds like a reasonable way to die when the individual doesn't know what's going on or is accepting/willing. As an execution method it's shit.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (15 children)

Well, disregarding the normal fear of death that would be there regardless of the method, I think the issue is the mask. It would be much better to just fill the room with N2. You can do this easilly enough by evaporating liquid N2. Of course, this would not be "medical grade" so people would complain just to complain.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (43 children)

We could also just not kill people. Kinda seems to be at the root of this problem.

load more comments (43 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Yeah the mask and timing is what caused that one prisoner to be in so much suffering since he knew it was going to happen imminently so he held his breath.

If it were done gradually over a period of like 30 minutes, he likely wouldn't have noticed and just drifted into unconsciousness.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 8 months ago (1 children)

AirGas, Air Products, and Matheson are the manufacturers, for anyone interested.

My job's vendor is also mentioned:

Other manufacturers of medical nitrogen in the US were more circumspect. Linde, a global multinational founded in Germany and headquartered in the UK, would not say whether it was willing to sell its product for use in US death chambers and declined to comment.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's a yes from Linde then

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago

Just got the optics I would really avoid "execution gas chambers" being on my product applications sheet if I were a German company.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I wonder which tactic Republicans will take when it inevitably turns out they're buying it from China- lie that they're doing it or insist that they have to due to the evil liberal elite?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean, they buy trumps shirty merch that's made in china.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago (11 children)

This is an honest question. In the US we probably put down thousands of household pets each month. Many of them have their owners right there beside them holding their paw. It isn't tramatic for the pet or the owner.

How can it be this difficult for us to humanely execute a human?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

Because we're kill our pets out of love, and we kill inmates out of hate. Humane treatment isn't difficult, the cruelty is intentional.

So long as were still using the barbaric practice of state-sanctioned murder, the practice itself will remain barbaric. The only solution is to eliminate the death penalty like the rest of the civilized western world.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Nitrogen is almost 80% of air so it’s hardly in short supply. Also why would you need medical grade? This is like alcohol swabs at the IV insertion site for lethal injection. They just don’t want the bad publicity of being associated, but it’s not going to stop anything.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah. It is one thing when the state needs a controlled substance like execution drugs. In that case, there are only a handfull of places to get it, and they are all required to vet their purchasers anyway.

For Nitrogen, anyone who wants some can just order a canister off of Amazon and get it delivered no questions asked. Or, for a few thousand, have their own N2 generator.

Would defense lawyers raise hell about non-medical N2 being used? Sure, but they raise hell about everything; its their job. You would delay all executions for a few years while the appeals process plays out. Then end up with a final ruling saying that consumer grade N2 is good enough.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I think the death penalty should just go away but if you're going to have it I don't understand why prisons are so gong-ho about all these complicated execution methods.

Why don't they just shoot people? That would work. It simple, it's quick, and it involves cool guns, which shouldn't really be a consideration but it's the US so it is.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Seems sensible enough. Even if you agreed that there should be a death penalty and nitrogen is a humane way to do it the tiny amount of money you could potentially make supplying it would not be worth the potential PR hit.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Nitrogen generators are relatively cheap and compact these days, so I don't see this having a huge impact if a prison really wants to go this route

load more comments
view more: next ›