this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
73 points (96.2% liked)

Interesting Shares

1058 readers
77 users here now

Share interesting articles, projects, research, pictures, or videos.


Please include a prefix in your title!


Prefixes for posts

Certain clients offer filters to make prefixes searchable. Photon (m.lemmy.zip) used for hyperlinks below:


Icon attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Despite today's date, this is not an April Fool's prank. At a press conference in Tokyo last weekend, professor Hiroshi Yoshida from the Tohoku University Research Center for Aged Economy and Society, sounded the alarm bell for a looming crisis. By the year 2531, e

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago

law that mandates married couples share the same surname.

Japan’s outdated law that prohibits separate surnames.

ahh now it makes sense

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ah, damn. I wish I could read their paper (article doesn’t mention a translation). That’s incredibly interesting!

From the article, it is because 1.83% of the population in Japan has a last name of Sato (and also I assume probably because of their low immigration). A law in Japan forces married women to take their husband’s name.

I wonder if there is a number like that for the US? Like if 10% of the population had a last name of Smith, would we all become Mr/Ms Smith after x years? Do all countries converge to a single name after a finite amount of years?

Will the whole world be Wang after x million years?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Will the whole world be Wang after x million years?

No, because the paper is nonsense and the scientist is probably releasing it for political reasons. Wives being forced to take their husband's surnames do not directly contribute to a single surname taking over, since there's a proportionally equal chance that they're moving away from the Sato surname. The main issue that affects the odds is how many male kids the non-Satos have as well as societal pressures (like this one).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The math is also wrong.

You can't apply exponential growth to the proportion of a total.

Growing from 1% to 2% (a 100% gain) is equally a reduction from 99% to 98%, a 1.01% drop.
Going from 99% to 100% (a 1.01% gain) is equally a reduction from 1% to 0%, an infinite drop.

Simple exponential modeling is the wrong tool.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Oh… he’s just doing an exponential growth model?? I have trouble understanding how this got traction at all then, he should be embarrassed. Maybe the delivery was tongue-in-cheek?

I assumed there was more interesting happening in that paper. How disappointing.

I assumed there was more behind that graph (I assumed he calculated the coefficient from something more interesting and just slapped it on a graph with like y = exp(\beta_0 x) for his news article)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

I would watch an anime based on that white paper. With subtitles.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

-2531. That's pretty optimistic for humankind.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Japan will be swimming with the fishies, best case scenario

[–] possiblylinux127 4 points 7 months ago

The Onion, is that you?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Damn. Imagine if everyone's last name was "Smith". Wild.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Let me introduce you to Nguyen

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

OK so ridiculous paper, but check out the stage presence on this guy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago