this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
128 points (95.7% liked)

Anti-Corporate Movement

409 readers
1 users here now

This community is the first one on lemmy of its kind. It sits between the idea of anarchism/anti-capitalism and left leaning economic policy.

Our goal is to make people aware of the dangers of corporate control, its influence on governments and people as well as the small but steady abrasion of empathy around the world indirectly caused by it.

Current topics this includes but is not limited to:

Feel free to debate this but beware, corporate rhetoric is not welcome here. If you have arguments, bring them on. If its rhetoric trying to defend the evil actions of corporations, we will know and you will go.

Our declared goal so far is to have all companies and individuals worldwide capped at 999 mil USD in all assets, including ownership of other companies, sister companies and marital assets. The reason for this is that companies (and individuals) are not supposed to resemble small(?) countries with a single leader(-board) and shareholder primacy. Thats why we feel like they must be kept in check indefinitely.

But companies will just wander off The argument that large companies will just wander off is valid, which we embrace. We dont need microsoft, apple, google, amazon and other trillion dollar companies. There are small competitors being kept small and driven into brankruptcy by anti competitive behavior of these giants or simply bought up and closed. If starbucks left tomorrow, we would not have an issue with this.

But then we have x little microsofts that all belong to the same person(s) If in fact nobody was allowed to accumulate more than 999 mil in assets, they would not be able to own all these. And like defending agains burglary, it is not about complete defence but time and effort. You only have to keep the thief occupied long enough for them to be caught, give up or make a mistake.

But these giants have tons of IP which would then limit our growth Thats another topic we must touch on. We will (only this one time) take a page out of russias playbook and demand that IP of non complying companies (assets over 999 mil USD) will be declared invalid, which opens them up to be copied.

But then they will "live" in one country that doesnt accept this Correct, and they should be taken into custody the moment they enter the airspace of a country that supports this act.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

From the reports it is nowhere near proprietary systems, yet. Its a great development though and it shows what a single person can do for the community. We should shower this person with praise!

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

“I am intending on open-sourcing the entire stack (PCB schematic/layout, all the HDL, Windows WDDM drivers, API runtime drivers, and Quake ported to use the API) at some point, but there are a number of legal issues,” Barrie wrote in a Hacker News post on Wednesday. Because he works in a tangentially related vocation, he wants to make sure none of this work would break his work contract or licensing etc.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh that sucks. There is a chance greater than 0 that he has signed some sort of non-compete that would prevent him from open sourcing his project. But let’s hope his company is like xerox was with the mouse and waves it off, effectively allowing him to continue.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Aren't non-competes not legal? It's a pile of corporate America horseshit, you can win their asses in court

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

IANAL, so I really do not know. But what I do know is that a lot of people do not have the resources to fight a company in court over it. I had an experience where I was unfairly terminated, and the lawyer I consulted with said I could take it to court, but it would most likely cost more than I’d receive. I’m sure that is a common sentiment in our (US) legal system as a whole.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Non-competes aren't enforceable, but proprietary "work-for-hire" clauses might be. I think the difference is that a company can't stop you from working for a competitor, but they can force you to sign away your rights to anything you create while employed there. I have worked for a couple of big-box consulting companies, and they have you list anything you created before joining them, so any new creations are automatically theirs.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

thats how we fix the gpu shortage.

i hope this project or something similar picks up steam.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

I hope so too! :)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Let’s hope this enables other ppl to start making their own ones and therefore, decentralise the market esp from Nvidia

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Amen! Thanks for chiming in. We need to remind ourselves, each other and those who dont undersrand yet: monopolistic or oligopolistic markets are not healthy for us.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Even if it crashes and burns people like these should have statues made in their honour.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Very much so. Instead of the jeff & elon trading card game all those tech bros have under their pillow.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Amazing stuff!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Wow, this is totally amazing! Can't wait to assemble one myself once he open-sources it