this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
253 points (98.8% liked)

World News

38506 readers
3087 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Universal Music Group (UMG.AS), Sony Music Entertainment (6758.T) and other record labels on Friday sued the nonprofit Internet Archive for copyright infringement over its streaming collection of digitized music from vintage records.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Record labels are such greedy fuckers, they sue an non-profit org used as an archive... fuck all of them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Don't underestimate the other guys greed.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The labels' lawsuit filed in a federal court in Manhattan said the Archive's "Great 78 Project" functions as an "illegal record store" for songs by musicians including Frank Sinatra, Ella Fitzgerald, Miles Davis and Billie Holiday.

Representatives for the Internet Archive did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the complaint.

The Internet Archive is already facing another federal lawsuit in Manhattan from leading book publishers who said its digital-book lending program launched in the pandemic violates their copyrights.

A judge ruled for the publishers in March, in a decision that the Archive plans to appeal.

The labels' lawsuit said the project includes thousands of their copyright-protected recordings, including Bing Crosby's "White Christmas," Chuck Berry's "Roll Over Beethoven" and Duke Ellington's "It Don't Mean a Thing (If It Ain't Got That Swing)".

The lawsuit said the recordings are all available on authorized streaming services and "face no danger of being lost, forgotten, or destroyed."


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It only shows how ridiculous the copyright laws are. Songs recorded in the 1940s and 50s should've long been public domain by now.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Oh I do for sure.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

The music industry is run by piranhas.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The labels said their damages in the case could be as high as $412 million.

Yeah, I'm sure. They also said:

The lawsuit said the recordings are all available on authorized streaming services and "face no danger of being lost, forgotten, or destroyed."

How are you gonna make $4m on those recordings if everyone streams them from Spotify etc? Talking out of both sides of the mouth. Fuck these people.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure them only existing on authorized streaming services means they're in direct danger of being lost, forgotten, or destroyed. Copyright holders generally are against preservation. They love it when their products are scarce.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There really needs to be a rule that if you don't make your IP available to the public, it becomes public domain after a year.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

That is actually a law in many countries.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

rules for rights for music should be same like rules for latents. If you pay then your rights are protected, if not then no protection. And the max is only 25 years. It's stupid, and only for profits for mafia like sony, that the rights are even 70 yeras after dead of artist.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I am actually surprised Internet Archive has not had copyright problems in the past because I have ocasionally downloaded videos that are 1:1 contents from now dead/unseeded torrents.