this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
483 points (98.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5197 readers
1798 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 55 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hard disagree. Retail workers have it bad enough and the situation has to have been absolutely awful for this guy to actually get arrested instead of coddled by management.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I tend to agree. Superficially, attacking someone with a poptart sounds funny, but I'm sure irl, it was more like repeatedly punching with the poptart in hard or throwing a bunch of shit around like a pouting toddler. I imagine the worker was a child or elderly too and not the 6'2" guy they make stock the high shelves.

Edit: I was wrong... he did just throw a poptart... but it was while shoplifting, so that explains the arrest.

https://cbsaustin.com/news/local/man-facing-felony-charge-after-allegedly-throwing-pop-tart-at-walgreens-employee

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's why the Joker can keep on jokering.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I don't know, The Joker used to be written to be funny, and DC keeps trying to strip that away from him.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm not defending the guy but this is a good reason why it is generally against protocol to confront shoplifters. Just let your employer collect the evidence and handle it their way.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

Confronting shoplifters is stupid. Why risk your safety for a corporation that won't risk anything for you? Especially when they're worth billions of dollars and you're making minimum wage. Is it really worth your life to save some faceless corporation two dollars? That's not even getting into the fact that people who are stealing food are probably starving and desperate.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nothing even hints at this being about shoplifting. I agree with what you said, but there's nothing that says it's related to this at all.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We don't have pop tarts where I live so I was about 15 when I first travel to america and eat one. This thing is HARD! it could easily be used as weapon (also horrible!)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

IDK where you got it from but they're not usually hard lol, most people toast them too

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Anything's a weapon if you're determined enough

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Was it still wrapped? I wanna hear the smack it made.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I can already hear it in my head.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

how would they word a law like this?

how can we objectively define what is funny or not?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nah, then we would have people vote bombing for people like Trump to get off because inciting Jan 6. was "funny".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Yes, that's the joke. There would always be some group voting that kitten genocide is funny

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

that sounds like a great idea honestly

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

"if monetizing a video of a crime can pay for the damages caused by the crime and there were no injuries, no deaths, no falsehoods portrayed, and no undermining of an election occurs then the crime will be recorded but no fines or penalties shall be levied."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Maybe let the victim pick between charging the attacker or getting all proceeds from the monetized video? Probably lead to lots of people deliberately setting up increasingly complex ways for a friend to attack them, then they split the proceeds. Hmm, the rational part of me says bad idea, but the descended-from-folks-that-loved-watching-gladiator-fights part of me would totally watch.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago