this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
101 points (100.0% liked)

Ukraine

8189 readers
424 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 41 points 5 months ago

At least Ukrainian cope cages don’t look like something 40k Orks would slap on a Leman Russ

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not sure what this is trying to accomplish, obviously it is trying to predetonate a HEAT round, but does that really defeat the kind of munitions mounted on drones in Ukraine?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, I dont know physics equations, but one of them is that force goes down either exponentially or logarithmically with increased distance. If they are detonated further away, even by a small amount, it can make a big difference

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Err well for HEAT rounds, the lethality comes from the warhead on say an RPG, detonating when it hits tank armor and sending a highly pressurized explosive jet that projects out the front of the warhead and into and through the tank armor into the interior.

With more sophisticated models of RPG and other shoulder launched HEAT rockets though, causing this jet to form 8 inches back from the actual surface of the tank armor doesn’t really help and can make it worse in some ways (depending on the design of the HEAT munition it might actually help the munition defeat a vehicle’s armor).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Part of the pressure comes from the confining from the armor material.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Looks way better then what Russia is doing with those strom drain grates.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Woodland camouflage M1 🫶

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Looks like they're specifically trying to protect the magazine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Have there been any combat losses of the m1a1 to drones in Ukraine?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A few, they actually pulled them from the front reportedly but i guess now they're back with added protection

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Even in Iraq and Afghanistan it was commonplace to have the m1's equipped with the anti-rpg cages. Can't imagine why they would take them off. I'd think they would offer some protection and a good frame for a closer knit if needed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

@Railing5132 @fluxion Not military, but guessing that it had to do with weight in transport. Surely that can be replaced?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Sounds credible, I suppose, but what's a few hundred pounds when shipping a multi-ton box of rolling armor and pew-pew?