this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
230 points (99.6% liked)

Interesting Global News

2370 readers
14 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukraine will be able to use Danish and Dutch F-16s to strike into Russia, while Belgium is saying only for use in 1991-border Ukraine.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/Iv4Fu

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Ukraine: "I consent."

Denmark: "I consent."

Russia: "Was there somebody you forgot to ask?"

The myth of consentual flights of F-16s into Russian territory.

[–] BrikoX 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Same way Russia forgot to ask Ukraine, Ukraine forgot to ask Russia. Seems fair.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

forgot to ask Ukraine

After how many Minsk Agreements mediated by the OSCE would you consider Ukraine properly "asked"?

[–] BrikoX 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The same ones that Russia and Ukraine hates? They can't even agree on the meaning of them, since they are such an ambiguous mess that doesn't specify anything.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Skill issue. Were I the Ukrainians I simply would have negotiated a better treaty.

[–] BrikoX 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Skill issue on Russia's part too. Let's be fair here.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No doubt. Russia placed too much faith in the OSCE and France and Germany approaching the process in good faith. Merkel later came out and said that the Minsk process was just a time-buying exercise so that NATO could arm Ukraine as a proxy against Russia.

Ukraine, of course, knew that it was being armed and trained and had the carrot of NATO and EU membership dangled before it. Circling back to the original point, the fact that Ukraine was being armed and trained at such a rate is good evidence that Ukraine absolutely knew what was about to happen.

[–] BrikoX 5 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Russia placed too much faith in the OSCE and France and Germany approaching the process in good faith.

I'm not sure if you're calling Putin a stupid man that is easily manipulated or incompetent. No politician ever in their lives did anything in good faith, Putin included. You must be very naive to think that.

<...> good evidence that Ukraine absolutely knew what was about to happen.

That's an empty speculation. Knowing and preparing for a possibly are completely different things. Also, if you note the timing on the war, it stared a month before a US company was about to start extracting oil and gas from the Ukraine territory and cut off Russia from Europe as supplier. The reason for the invasion was pure greed and not some stupid notions of NATO expansion or cries for help from Russian separatist groups.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

I'm not sure if you're calling Putin a stupid man that is easily manipulated or incompetent. No politician ever in their lives did anything in good faith, Putin included. You must be very naive to think that.

Very cool that the argument boils down to "of course we were going to trick you, you are stupid for being tricked." I guess the lesson the world should learn is to never trust a Euroid and to respond to European peace overtures with uncompromising force.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Would you say Ukraine was "preparing for a possibly (sic)" when its Nazi special forces were creating Hitlerjugend-style child soldier training camps?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No politician ever in their lives did anything in good faith

"My country has broken hundreds of treaties and wipes its ass with international law, but it's actually OK because it's impossible for anyone to operate differently"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

"Anyway, liberal democracy is the best because I get to choose the bad faith actor who will fuck me over."

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Lmao what a cop out. At bare minimum Ukraine should have stopped allowing fascist paramilitary groups to shell civilians in the east, an act that was illegal a half a dozen other ways, too. And Angela Merkel admitted the agreements were not an attempt to actually resolve that issue or the issue of the west installing a hostile foreign government via coup, but to give Ukraine time to arm up to fight Russia:

In an interview published in Germany's Zeit magazine on Wednesday, former German chancellor Angela Merkel said that the Minsk agreements had been an attempt to "give Ukraine time" to build up its defences.

https://www.reuters.com/world/putin-russia-may-have-make-ukraine-deal-one-day-partners-cheated-past-2022-12-09/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Well since neither of them included any sort of language to the effect of "Russia gets to invade if the terms of this agreement aren't upheld", I'm gonna go with more than two. Especially considering DPR forces kept pushing for Debaltseve after both agreements.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

The same way Ukraine forgot to ask the families of Jewish people killed in the Holocaust if they could put up statues and monuments commemorating Nazi collaborators including OUN members who participated in carrying out the Holocaust?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

On the other hand, who gives a shit if Russia burns for their ongoing aggression.

Not many people complain when an entire country reaches the "find out" part of "fuck around and find out" when they've had many years to course correct.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I think what they meant is that those planes are not getting to Russia before being destroyed.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The problem with the Danes is that they have been so sheltered for so long that the concept of their actions having consequences simply don't register any more. Everything is going to be welfare, roast pork and padding ourselves on the back for all eternity, war and disaster and calamity is something they have in "the warm countries", it will never affect us.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So what happens if some Danish military bases get bombed or a frigate gets sunk with dozens of dead? Does Denmark pull back or call for WWIII?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Lots of commotion internally in Denmark while the reaction would be decided upon in Washington.

I don't think Russia wants to retaliate so directly though. As I see it they have very little to gain from taking that bait. More likely acts of retaliation would be plausibly deniable cyber attacks or supporting some proxy in attacking Danish interests abroad. If I was a Danish troop in Iraq, I would be watching my back after this.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I doubt Russia would escalate in that way. If it happens, I'd imagine a "tit for tat" thing happening, where the Nordic countries sink the Russian Baltic Fleet and say that they consider the matter resolved.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (27 children)

When you say nordic countries, you mean sweden, norway, and finland would do a massive escalation, and open themselves up to retaliation? Surely they'd do the calculus and see there's nothing to gain and a lot to lose? I've heard the political situation in the EU was not great, but I expect that kind of hawkishness here on the other side of the planet, not from the countries that actually stand to lose anything.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well considering both the EU and NATO have articles of mutual defence, they've already agreed to it twice (or once, for Norway and Iceland). I'm not sure sinking a ships qualifies as an escalatory response to bombing bases and sinking ships though. At that point the escalation has already happened.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

But you don't understand, if a Russian soldier shoots a NATO soldier, that's realpolitik, if a NATO soldier shoots back it's

ESCALATION

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

The Kremlin's jets are flying over Ukraine and part of their barbaric land grab, why shouldn't Ukrainians fly over Russia to stop attacks on their home?

Go bomb the shit out of them. Shoot down the terrorist bombers launching missiles at markets and playgrounds.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nice gesture but why would Ukraine risk losing their new toys on adventurism where is work closer to to home to be done.

Now if they were supplying rockets with ranges over 200km and then they gave consent to such use... That would be a more meaningful move and would let Russia know that using NK rockets has consequences.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Nice gesture but why would Ukraine risk losing their new toys on adventurism where is work closer to to home to be done.

Where the frontline is close to the official border, Russia is able to keep its artillery and logistics on the Russian side of the border where Ukraine is not allowed to use half of its equipment. Russia's ongoing Kharkiv offensive is an example of this

Now if they were supplying rockets with ranges over 200km

France and Britain have been supplying the storm shadow missile, which has almost three times that range. Ukraine has been launching it from its own Su-24 aircraft, but those are very old and there aren't a lot of them left. The F-16 could be a good new platform to launch them from. As I understand it, storm shadow and F-16 are not compatible out of the box and would need some modification, but the same was true for the Su-24 and that appears to have worked out

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

This means it is the US who has authorized them flying over Russian territory, Usually it is the country of origin that holds the right to specify how those arms should not be used.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Good thing Russia allowed Ukraine to use all those Migs and SUs against them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

The country of origin of those jets no longer exists. The USSR fell a while ago.

load more comments
view more: next ›