98
submitted 1 month ago by Blaze to c/[email protected]
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 58 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 54 points 1 month ago

naming is essential

if you make and kill four separate apps all called variations around "google pay" there's a tiny chance people gets confused

[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago

A lot of people hear the app is dead and assume they no longer can tap to pay and just stop doing it altogether. My mom’s like that.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Exactly. At the end of the day, naming is not that relevant as long as it conveys the message of what the app does. It only gets confusing when you have a bunch of apps doing the same thing

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Google isn’t interested in good UX, so they prioritize the next “new” internally to their staff. This is the end result. It’s why I switched from Android (and I was pretty huge fanboy in my teens haha) to iOS. Apples got its own issues but the user experience end to end is leagues ahead. Phones don’t innovate anymore so in the end I just want a solid pocket computer with a great camera.

[-] mynamesnotrick 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm confused just by this announcement. +1 to that.

Edit: I thought wallet was "pay".

[-] possiblylinux127 0 points 1 month ago

Tell that to Microsoft as well

[-] [email protected] 51 points 1 month ago

They just transitioned to Google Wallet, which lacks some features, notably peer-to-peer transactions. The API for virtual banking cards that most banking apps use instead of including their own NFC driver, also called "Google Pay", will keep working. At least that's how I understand it.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I mean, Venmo is a thing. Google Wallet /GPay is just so I don't have to take out my wallet to pay TBH.

[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago

Google often feels like a disorganized company with constantly shifting priorities, and a big reason behind that is the lack of top-down initiatives from the CEO. That means the real driving force behind most projects at Google are mid-level executives who show up with grand plans and then leave—either in disgrace or triumph—when those initial plans run their course.

Makes a lot of sense. There doesn't seem to be a unifying strategy behind anything google does. I also think theres a vicious circle going on here: google has a loyalty problem, which could be solved by long term thinking, usually done by loyal employees, but employees don't stick around long enough.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

It isn't a problem with long term employees. The problem is that promotion at Google typically relies on developing new products. Long term employees aren't incentivized to improve existing products.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Oh that's interesting, I wasn't aware of this. Is it an unspoken policy? Or its an over reliance on "innovation first" pseudo-management?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I think it’s more like a pattern observed in many of the blog posts about the reasons ex-employees left Google after a while.

[-] possiblylinux127 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think it was a mistake for Google to jump into AI last minute. I think they should of offered separate AI products and let growth happen naturally. Meanwhile Microsoft and OpenAI will shoot themselves in the foot.

Being a normal non AI focused company would of been a good look. They could simply have some basic AI tools that are actually useful.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Another one bites the dust?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

I never use these apps, I just don't trust them at all. In a world of cyber security worries, we put all of our financial info on an app and a phone and expect everything to be safe. I'm just old school. Safety over convenience... as I am In an uber. Lol

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago

Phone payments are magnitudes more secure than card payments as they basically are equivalent to using a brand new card and throwing it away for each transaction (in simplified terms)

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I'm just old school and I always think of a phone snatch. But I understand what you are saying.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

It's still safer. They can steal your wallet and pay for anything trivially. If they steal your phone, they have to be able to unlock it to pay with it.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

It's a valid point. I'm just not one to put all my eggs in one basket. That is just me.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

...isn't your card one basket full of your eggs?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Really the physical wallet. Or maybe that's a basket full of baskets lol

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Anything up to a certain amount. All the banks here have configurable limits for contactless payments (both in number of payments per day and in total amount). If you go over the limit they ask you to confirm in a way that requires the phone anyway. You can also block the cards remotely.

I'd say it's a decent mix of convenience and security, even if you use cards.

And sometimes you have to resort to using cards because some banks have been migrating from using the NFC directly to using Google Pay and I for one don't relish giving Google insight into my shopping.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

You usually have to opt-in to NFC payments without an unlock or confirmation. Actually, I've never heard of that as a default setting.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

If you go over the limit they ask you to confirm in a way that requires the phone anyway

Oh interesting. Where I am if you go over the limit (usually $100), you just have to input your PIN. But $100 is enough to get up to some serious trouble, considering it's a per-purchase limit.

And I've both never heard of banks using the NFC directly (as opposed to using Google, Apple, Garmin etc. Pay), and wouldn't trust them in the slightest with it even if they did offer it, because they're not exactly known for great security. (And I'll take security over privacy any day.)

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

They ask for PIN too but that's a different limit ($20 by default but also configurable). The limits I mentioned block payments for the day if not confirmed.

never heard of banks using the NFC directly

Really? I've never heard of Garmin Pay. 😄 But that's the whole point of the NFC chip being open on Android, so apps can use it directly. On iPhone it's an artificial limitation imposed by Apple so they can take their cut from payments and have a processor monopoly. On Android any app can just do it — not only banking apps and not only payments, the NFC can be used for lots of things like opening doors etc. There are apps like meal tickets that can issue payments, gym apps and so on. Giving that up and going with Google is extremely narrow sighted.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Oh yeah I know it's theoretically possible. I've just never heard of it actually being done, for payments specifically, by banks. Using Google Pay doesn't restrict you from also using any of those other use cases: you're not giving anything up in terms of flexibility of functionality.

Yeah Garmin Pay is the equivalent on Garmin smartwatches. Unfortunately it's not as widely supported by banks (at least where I live) as Google and Apple Pay are.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

You still need biometrics, passwords, pins.

I get the nerves, but I can't find any reasonable way it's less secure

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Fair enough... I'll just pay with IOU's 😂😂😂😂

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

That's what the chip on the card does too. It's an embedded computer that generates one time codes just like the phone.

The main difference is that the phone typically has an extra security measure, like requiring the screen to be on to pay (but you can get a mesh wallet which prevents tap from working); or the phone needs to be unlocked, which is actually useful.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

You should look up info about phone payments and temp card numbers in order to reduce some of your fears. Also, check out what is actually stored in epay apps when there's a connection through a provider, like a bank integration or an integration to another epay partner.

PCI security is about as high as you'd expect from companies that tell consumers they won't lose their own money to fraud. When it's the bank's money, you'd better believe they care.

There are far easier ways to get someone's money and this ain't it.

this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
98 points (93.8% liked)

Android

16952 readers
227 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: [email protected]


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: [email protected]

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: [email protected]

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to [email protected].

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to [email protected].

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS