this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
45 points (75.9% liked)

Technology

59200 readers
2734 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If SpaceX is that critical to national defense & foreign policy, it should be nationalized.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Nationalizing SpaceX would turn it into nowadays NASA’s system which is risk zero and the expense of pushing the envelope and fast changes. SpaceX doesn’t mind blowing up 10 rockets while nasa will spend years to design one and launch it once.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

It doesn't behoove us to have one man be capable of derailing entire segments of our national policy at his whim, especially when that man was never elected to anything.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

It's not like they'd HAVE to continue with the same policy.

B'sides, at least NASA doesn't blow up a launch pad within a nature preserve just to stay on schedule...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

SpaceX doesn’t mind blowing up 10 rockets

SpaceX doesn’t mind blowing up living people, too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

SpaceX doesn’t mind blowing up living people, too

Assuming /u/NeoNachtwaechter is conflating companies, lumping Starlink in with SpaceX. So that would make him a pro-Russian sympathizer. If not, describe and discuss your evidence.

Just alluding to “people” means shit. Aligning with Putin is shit.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Bite me. Just because I’m not poisonous doesn’t mean I’m a bot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Who have they blown up?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What makes you say that?

I mean, Elon, sure, but did the company overall do something I missed...?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What makes you say that?

Conversations with employees of that company

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So no actual proof, eh?

Look - IMHO, Elon and his cars are expensive garbage, but for real accusations on his character and business ethics/acumen to stick, you need to show proof - not hearsay.

That’s the shit he sells.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There's nothing but proof that's publicly available. Now, I don't have the sourced wall of text post readily at hand (that you would immediately ignore and attempt to wiggle your way out of as you seem a bit of a sycophant), but you're being disingenuous if you can't admit that he objectively lacks character/ethics in his business and personal life.

If you do somehow genuinely need an education on how much of a grifter fraud elon is, you start with watching all the videos about him on the YouTube channel called (I believe), thunderfoot. Just search elon and thunderfoot in YouTube.

But I don't think you'll be doing any of that... I imagine you'll be spending your evening sitting in your bathtub in your tesla bot spandex onesie making hyperloop noises and constantly refreshing the order status page for your 6 year old tesla semi pre-order?

Regardless of you offering qualifiers that his products are crap, nobody defending elon in 2023 is a serious person.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you didn't actually answer anything

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess the Hyperloop noise is just silence then? As it doesn't actually exist.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

SpaceX doesn’t mind blowing up living people, too

Try to focus. We're still on the accusation SpaceX kills people.

Stop moving the target; you just come off as a ranting looney. If we're to turn the tide on Musk's propensity to lie and cheat, we have to look at least honest in what we're offering as proof, and not some half-baked constant argument.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

Their way of working. It is like a software shop, for example the "fail fast" principle.

This seems disruptive in the world of engineering, and it has caused many people wonder. But it is not the best way if you suddenly have living people sitting in the rockets.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I mean, we didn't nationalize Lockheed-Martin or Boeing or Northrop-Grumman or Raytheon or General Dynamics, etc. I think we can survive without nationalizing the company as we've done throughout our defense history.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Those companies had boards of directors and people at the top who were known to be reliable partners. SpaceX has an idiotic juvenile at the helm. The situations are barely even comparable.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Those companies had boards of directors and people at the top who were known to be reliable partners. SpaceX has an idiotic juvenile at the helm. The situations are barely even comparable.

Not a student of history I take it? I give you Howard Hughes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

SpaceX and Tesla now have effective senior management that insulate their divisions from Musk. His impact there is increasingly minimal, if at all present.

Where Musk is allowed to be Musk is Twitter, an emblem of his wonderful management style.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

None of those companies had the ability to stop their equipment in the field from working if they decided one day they'd rather support our enemies. And they didn't have a history of being influenced by our enemies.

The article makes it clear that Musk has already gotten Ukrainian soldiers killed with his shenanigans. We should not allow him the chance to do it again.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Its unclear that we are surviving them, or at least not paying them blood money too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If SpaceX is that critical to national defense & foreign policy, it should be nationalized.

Remove the SpaceX name from that statement and the statement is just as crazy.

Examples:

  • If Verizon is that critical to national defense & foreign policy, it should be nationalized.
  • If Raytheon is that critical to national defense & foreign policy, it should be nationalized.
  • If Northrup Grumman is that critical to national defense & foreign policy, it should be nationalized.
  • If General Dynamics Electric Boat is that critical to national defense & foreign policy, it should be nationalized.
  • If Honeywell International is that critical to national defense & foreign policy, it should be nationalized.
  • If Boeing is that critical to national defense & foreign policy, it should be nationalized.
  • If Norfolk Southern Railway is that critical to national defense & foreign policy, it should be nationalized.

It just isn't our country's way to steal a company from its owners or shareholders. Its a bit frightening you think it should be.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most or all of your examples have meaningfully valid competitors in the space. SpaceX does not, at least not yet.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So your rationale for seizing a private company is that it is better than its competitors?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it’s that as an effective monopoly, it has unreasonable power over the government.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're 17 years too late to use that argument in good faith. Not only is SpaceX not a monopoly (because there are many other companies you can buy launch services from in the USA) but because that wasn't the case in 2006 when Boeing and Lockheed (with USA government consent!) created a TRUE launch monopoly by merging to create ULA (United Launch Alliance).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not strictly arguing for federalization, but you’re arguing through whataboutism. And SpaceX is an effective monopoly. Otherwise we’d use other launch services at least some significant amount.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not strictly arguing for federalization,

You're replying to the thread where the OP wanted to nationalized SpaceX. I haven't heard you say different. What are you proposing instead?

but you’re arguing through whataboutism.

No, I'm citing precedent. Its extremely applicable because its the exact same industry, and even existed before SpaceX. .

And SpaceX is an effective monopoly. Otherwise we’d use other launch services at least some significant amount.

I don't think you follow spaceflight very much if you hold this statement. I'm assuming the "we" you're using here means US government launch.

Here's US government launches that ULA did in 2022 and 2023 so far: 7 launches

Delta IV Heavy | NROL-68 United Launch Alliance | USA Cape Canaveral, FL, USA June 22, 2023, 9:18 a.m.

Delta IV Heavy | NROL-91 United Launch Alliance | USA Vandenberg SFB, CA, USA Sept. 24, 2022, 10:25 p.m.

Atlas V 421 | SBIRS GEO-6 United Launch Alliance | USA Cape Canaveral, FL, USA Aug. 4, 2022, 10:29 a.m.

Atlas V 541 | USSF-12 United Launch Alliance | USA Cape Canaveral, FL, USA July 1, 2022, 11:15 p.m.

Atlas V N22 | CST-100 Starliner Orbital Flight Test 2 (OFT-2) United Launch Alliance | USA Cape Canaveral, FL, USA May 19, 2022, 6:54 p.m.

Atlas V 541 | GOES-T United Launch Alliance | USA Cape Canaveral, FL, USA March 1, 2022, 9:38 p.m.

Atlas V 511 | USSF-8 United Launch Alliance | USA Cape Canaveral, FL, USA Jan. 21, 2022, 7 p.m.

source

How is SpaceX am "effective" monopoly?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I was arguing a point, not a position.

And SpaceX is literally the only means by which the US is able to send astronauts to the ISS currently. StarLink is a strategically critical service for military and probably other purposes.

Precedent does not intrinsically imply merit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So... In your opinion, it should be allowed to operate like any normal company without restrictions? What would happen if, say, a powerful Chinese investor attempted to buy it outright?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So… In your opinion, it should be allowed to operate like any normal company without restrictions?

I can't tell what you're trying to say with your first sentence. Most companies DO have specific restrictions based upon their industry, environmental impact, and various forms of regulatory compliance. SpaceX isn't an exception.

What would happen if, say, a powerful Chinese investor attempted to buy it outright?

It likely wouldn't be allowed just like other national strategic companies. What is your point with that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And what if a nation bought the guy in charge? You know, like has potentially already happened with the PIF

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There's a caveat. Most countries will heavily regulate access to limited resources, for example radio frequency bands. SpaceX is occupying defined orbit which means it's perfectly reasonable to ensure society benefits from this privilege.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Meh. Fuck all those corporate assholes.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Musk told Kahl that the vivid illustration of how technology he had designed for peaceful ends was being used to wage war gave him pause.

Well you see, there's you're problem right there... You're completely full of shit. Musk has never designed anything.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

My brain thought I was on [email protected] for a second