this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
20 points (85.7% liked)

Games

16369 readers
634 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He showed off a prototype of this headset a while ago wich would kill the user upon death in the game.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't that more like a tribute to sao ?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Yes. That was the joke.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’d sacrifice all VR tech if it meant not giving the military yet another way to kill kids in foreign countries.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Can't they kill kids at home like normal people?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Guess virtual murder leads to real murder after all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Legislators will take too long to do anything about it though lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

What a fuck.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Dudes a piece of a shit, but this might unironically be good for VR tech.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Eh. The primary obstacles to VR right now are intercompatibility and cost. Facebook's bullshit is near the right price range, but it's from Facebook, so it's bullshit. Everything else is wildly overpriced for what remains a niche secondary gizmo atop already-expensive gaming setups, and it only works on one brand of gaming setup. All these motherfuckers took a scalpel to the nascent industry to slice up their tiny fragment of an itty-bitty pie.

I will tell companies this for free: use a point light source and focus becomes trivial. You don't need three inches of fancy folded optics. The proper Gumpei Yokoi approach is a textbook drawing of one lens, a liquid crystal panel, and a dot that emits light.

I've been telling companies this for free: use intermediate voxels and performance becomes irrelevant. Toy hardware can throw sprites at a zillion frames a second, with up-to-the-nanosecond head-tracking. Make games emit that cheap 3D data instead of giving them direct framebuffer access.

Of course if these people were serious, they'd use lightfield displays. Stick a grid of tiny lenses onto a high-res screen and you don't need focus because you're emitting a hologram. Nvidia had tech demos for this, an entire decade ago. The hardware is dirrrt cheap. But for some fucking reason we're still acting like Palmer's cheap hack remains state-of-the-art. Just stick fancier pancake polarizing birdbath Zeiss optics on this Google Cardboard thingamajig. More pixels! More pixels!