[-] [email protected] 32 points 16 hours ago

Headline should read, Heritage Foundation threatens bloodshed.

This is like reporting that a mob boss said it'd be terrible if something happened to your family.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 16 hours ago

The alternative is an 80-year-old moron saying he plans to kill you a little.

Fuck this OP.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago

I saw Junji Ito illustrations as decorative socks today.

The Nagatoro guy has some... archives.

You will live to see manmade horrors beyond your comprehension become billboards.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago

Well, someone did.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago

What'd the five fingers say to the face? SHLAP!

What'd Boris's face say to those five fingers? Achoo.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 20 hours ago

... because Katko used a mousetrap and a shotgun shell to blow a dude's leg off. Over some antique jars.

It's one of those cases where the jury immediately knows a line has been crossed and just needs to hash out how far back.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Jesus Christ the comments are even better.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

"It's vhisper quiet!," the gunner yells over the diesel engine.

Or is this more of a Ferdinand GT3 situation, where the driver is also the powertrain? Not that it would impact the speed.

In any case that's some gorgeous Keithharingtarnmuster.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 23 hours ago

On reflection, the real question is whether you're home at the time, since that makes it the castle doctrine instead of "defense of property." At which point you're free to go full Home Alone a la Last Crusade. The penitent doorkicker kneels! bzzZZZzzzt

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

Does a booby-trap that only responds to lethal force technically pass the Katko test?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

And there's no way one side has valid concerns and the other is fucking crazy.

Both sides, says one side.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

The nature of bad faith is that there is no right answer. Fuck off with this.

1
submitted 5 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
3
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
10
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/digital_circus
1
Couples' outfits (imgur.com)
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Source.

Previously posted on the other site.

4
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
0
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
Link and his dream girl (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
You got a thiiing (66.media.tumblr.com)
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
Selfie time (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
-2
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

'Well it's only passing mv a list of--' yeah yeah yeah, I know, and that's why I'm calling bullshit. It should be massively harder to execute filenames. Even if 1970s decisions make that the eternal hideous default: the lack of any idiot-proof standard workaround is incomprehensible.

StackOverflow's full of competing one-liners and people pointing out how each one is considered harmful. The least-skeezy options use exec. That sentence should make anyone recoil in horror.

This is not a filename problem. This is a tool problem. If a single printable character is going to silently expand into a list of names, then for god's sake, having it put each name in quotes should be fucking trivial.

0
Prelude to a mistake (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
1
Royal guard Link (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

mindbleach

joined 10 months ago