47
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

One approach to this is lightweight construction: the thinner the ceilings of a multi-storey building, for example, the more space is left for extra floors.

Anyone who has an upstairs neighbor: fuck you

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Given the way these are suspended and that you can fill the empty space with noise dampening material, they might be significantly better than normal concrete floors regarding noise transmission.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

... "using 3D printing – but instead of concrete, they used sand combined with a binder." ... o.k.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

So.... Mortar.

IT'S TOTALLY DIFFERENT BRO

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

Concrete is something like a tenth of humanity's total CO2 emissions, so if this is something that lets us use less concrete then that's actually great

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Plus structurally, even if it were off-the-shelf concrete vs mortar, it's still structurally different, so I'm sure that also makes a difference.

Mostly I was just making fun of the phrasing and distinction without actually clarifying the difference.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

How does concrete emit CO2?

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

The process of making it involves cooking limestone until the carbon dioxide comes out, basically. Limestone is CaCO3 (one calcium, one carbon, three oxygen). Cement requires lime, which is CaO (one calcium, one oxygen). That leaves a C and two O, which stick together on the way out

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Pretty clever, and I like how organic it looks. Come to think of it, wasn't H.R. Giger also Swiss?

Guess they like those organic designs.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Freaks me out if there was a little plaque explaining it before I went into the building, but if it works, no one's going to blink an eye.

Sounds like the right kind of retrofuture tech to me.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

but have they tested it against various types of wear and tear, environmental exposure, being hit by an american truck or other large damage, water damage from a toilet overflowing and going unnoticed for a couple months, other stuff...

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Obviously not yet, but given that similarly build churches have survived hundreds of years and multiple heavy earthquakes, I would say chances are high that it will be quite durable.

For water damage it would be probably more durable that regular concrete construction, as this mainly damages the rebar reinforcement, which can not be easily inspected for damage.

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
47 points (100.0% liked)

Solarpunk technology

2192 readers
28 users here now

Technology for a Solar-Punk future.

Airships and hydroponic farms...

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS