this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
57 points (98.3% liked)

Politics

265 readers
50 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Please be nice.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., who chairs the Judiciary subcommittee on federal courts, and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden of Oregon sent a letter last week asking Attorney General Merrick Garland to appoint a special counsel to examine whether Thomas violated federal ethics and tax laws when he didn't disclose as income more than $267,000 of a loan that was allegedly forgiven in 2008.

"We do not make this request lightly," the senators wrote. "The evidence assembled thus far plainly suggests that Justice Thomas has committed numerous willful violations of federal ethics and false-statement laws and raises significant questions about whether he and his wealthy benefactors have complied with their federal tax obligations."

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All we really need is the barest evidence and then due to the SCOTUS ruling the President can order the FBI to just have them arrested for corruption. Since he's immune from official actions, afterall.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

That's a good point, if the 5 corrupt judges are in jail, they can't vote to get themselves out, lol. Genius.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

There are 4 more that probably took bribes, go after all of them.