this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
97 points (96.2% liked)

Ukraine

7951 readers
816 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Wonder why the turret cope cage extends so far behind?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It almost looks like they welded a shipping container to the turret lmao

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

~~Extra protection for the machine gunners asshole?~~

*Wrong person.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

According to the "unboxing" video the AFU did of a captured turtle tank a few weeks ago, the main gun isn't even functional. I'd be surprised if the machine gun works.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Whats the point of sending a tank into battle without its main gun non-functional? Intimidation? Very small APC? Its got a functioning engine and can drive faster than walking speed?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's basically just a ultra cheapo disposable APC. Tanks that were too broken to be refurbished after being stored in the open for half a century. The driver can barely see, there are no defensive weapons and the mobiks just ride along on top inside the "shed". From what I've seen, they are not really expected to return after dropping off the troops.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If the orcs are down to sending out an "APC" that only holds 3 personnel (plus the driver), then this is looking good for Ukraine!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think so too. Here's the video if you're interested in the details:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zk7JrM2nLEg

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

That was an amazing walkthrough!

I initially thought that the main gun on that may have just broken along the way, but the fact that the reloading door was welded shut certainly corrects my error. I wonder if this was some kind of training tank to teach driving, so it would never had need of functional turret or ammo loading system.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That sentence would really benefit from an apostrophe.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I was referring to the Dildo of Consequence.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Oh that whole thing is the cope cage! I thought it was just a building behind it or something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

*Extra protection for the machine gunners asshole?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That thing is at minimum ~~66~~ 43 years old

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They were apparently produced all the way up to ‘81 in the USSR (‘83 in Czechoslovakia); so this one could be a spry, young 43 year old!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Ahh you are absolutely right, I had the design dates instead of the production dates

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

T-54: "There’s too much fucking shit on me!"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Is that thing shooting out of a fucking wardrobe?