this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
79 points (95.4% liked)

World News

38237 readers
3573 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Isn't this happening almost everywhere?

[–] Dudewitbow 17 points 1 month ago

its generally happening in any country that has a reletively speaking, high GDP, because regardless of where you are in the world, the wealth tends to collect in a small group of people rather than get spread out.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

It might be the media distorting it, but it seems like it's an especially big issue in East Asian countries. I didn't know about Singapore, but I know it's a serious issue in both South Korea and Japan, which are about to have a huge number of elderly and not enough people to care for them.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

It’s ridiculously expensive to live in singapore

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

0.97 PFF! Wake me up again when they're down at 0.52 like Korea, then you might get my attention.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

South Korea is low, but I'm sure it's not that low.

kagis

Yeah.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/09/asia/south-korea-government-population-birth-rate-intl-hnk/index.html

South Korea has the world’s lowest fertility rate, which indicates the average number of children a woman will have in her lifetime. It recorded a rate of just 0.72 in 2023

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wish it was the same ale over the world, we are too fucking many as it is!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We are experiencing record low birthrates globally, so rejoice!

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Doubt it, in the last 20 years we grew from 7 billion to 8. When that number goes to 4 I will be happy!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Both can be true, that we're experiencing record low birth rates globally and that the global population is still increasing at the moment.

How?

  1. While birth rates in many countries have fallen below replacement rate, it's still not zero, which means people are still having babies.
  2. Due to advances in health science, the death rate has fallen.

These two factors, especially decades earlier, mean that population hasn't yet fallen. However:

  1. Non-existent humans will not produce babies.
  2. The older the population is on the average, the higher the death rate will be.

This means that if I don't produce offspring, my non-existent offspring will not produce babies. The less babies are produced, the older the population would be, and the higher the death rate will be. If current trends continue, the death rate will overtake the birth rate, and the population will shrink.

Outside of a worldwide disaster that kills off people of child-bearing age, population will still rise before it levels off and then fall off as more and more people find less and less appealing to raise children. This is just a consequence of us humans not dying immediately after childbirth, and us humans as a whole making offspring at a certain age (say, 20 years old). These two factors explain the lag between childbirth figures and population growth.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok then we talk in 50 years and if the population is still above 4 billion I still will have a problem with this!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you have such a problem with too many people existing, do something about it. IDK.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I'm a nobody on the internet do I look like I got access to all the nuclear codes or something ? Simply put I can't you can't and no one can!