this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
858 points (96.8% liked)

Political Memes

5222 readers
3095 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

France is not the EU. This doesn't happen in other European countries because there are rules and proper times to make proper campaigns. I don't even think this is a good thing to joke about Americans because what was done in France was just plain stupid

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

France is great at revolutions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Didn't the Netherlands have a year of five premiers?

Also, Tories, y'all might want to disown them but the Brits are still euros as far as everyone else reckons, save maybe for a particularly unionist canadian or aussie.

Y'all might have rules about it but that doesn't change that snap elections basically guarantee no incentive to figure anything out because you can always just hit the do-over button until someone's base is the last one standing without turnout fatigue and someone secures an outright majority or a purely ideological coalition.

The idea of governing coalitions is kinda old fashioned anyways, just hold a STAR or approval vote for each of the cabinet positions including for premier and voilà, now you never have to engage in horse trading just to form a standing government, and the stress of negotiations can be reserved for law making or inter-departmental cabinet affairs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

We finally got rid of the previous prime minister after 12 years, what 5 premiers did I miss?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Sounds unstable and scary.

edit: calm down, I'm sure 90% of the time it's a much better system than the US, but the way it is described in the title does not sound stable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've read that in Belgium (the worst offendor in this regard), the regional governments have so much power that not having a national government for a year or so isn't much of a problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Belgium is a federal country, like Germany or the US. The regions have control over some things, not everything. Plus the current federal government stays as caretaker until a new government is formed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

I'd argue that political stability consists of and depends on at least rule of law, separation of powers and democratic representation. The EU and its member still have a lot to progress in this regard, though. Coalition building is kind of a comprise towards building pluralistic quasi-consensus based decision-making.

IMO, coalition political systems have the potential to politically deal better with long-term issues as small parties can influence governments beyond a single term. Green parties, but unfortunately also far-right parties, for example can thus push for their topics.

The US also had a coalition, the National Unity Party during its Civil War.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Better an unstable government than an unstable guy at the lead.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Not everything has to be a zero sum game

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›