this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
177 points (95.9% liked)

World News

38554 readers
2735 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukrainian president says Brasília-Beijing initiative shows “lack of respect” toward Kyiv’s position.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy accused Brazil of being pro-Russia in the Kremlin’s war on Ukraine and lambasted a joint peace proposal drawn up by Brasília and Beijing.

“The Chinese-Brazilian proposal is also destructive, it’s just a political statement,” Zelenskyy said during an interview with Brazilian news site Metrópoles on Wednesday evening.

Brazil and China signed a joint statement in May calling for peace talks involving both Russia and Ukraine. However, according to the Ukrainian president, the two countries consulted Moscow but not Kyiv.

“We are not stupid,” Zelenskyy said during the interview. “How can you offer ‘here is our initiative’ without asking anything from us?” He added, “This is a lack of respect toward Ukraine.”

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Well... yeah. Brazil's the B in BRICS and Russia's the R, so Brazil is officially pro-Russia.

And by the bye - China's the C.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Lula doesn't seem quite as straightforwardly pro-Russia as Bolsanaro was, but its very clear their economic association with Russia makes them unable to truly be neutral arbiters of the situation, no matter how much Lula wants to present Brazil as attempting to be neutral.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Lula doesn't seem quite as straightforwardly pro-Russia as Bolsanaro was,

He's even more pro-Russian...

"Lula argued in early April that Ukraine should consider ceding the Crimean Peninsula to negotiate peace with Russia, saying that “Zelensky cannot want it all.” "

That's right, Ukraine should not want their whole country, they should stop being 'selfish' and give in to Lula's benefactors demands... He's a flog.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

Yet he's carrying a Russian proposal straight out to Ukraine... so different.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Just because I found it's interesting and tangentialy related, here's a bunch of statistics on the BRICS States by the German federal office of statistics.

https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Laender-Regionen/Internationales/Thema/allgemeines-regionales/BRICS/_inhalt.html

Auto-translate should work. The statistic on CO₂ Emissions might be slightly unfair, as I assume a lot of that is directly, or indirectly related to production for G7 countries.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

India the I

South Africa the S

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

India and China hate each other very much, yet are on the same alliance.

And Russia is allied with both.

Hmm...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And also Egypt and Ethiopia were there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

BRICS is more about resisting european hegemony to establish a new hegemony than anything. As a unit, sometimes they'll say something real as hell, but generally speaking 90% of what they do is the same evil backstabbing shit we always talk about the US doing to influence global economics and sustain power. When BRICS is taken into consideration with the G-7 what we actually see is a two party system of global torture that more than anything wants to maintain the basic status quo, they just want to shift slightly who's on top

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Came to say this. Brazil is going to align themselves politically with these countries in the coming years.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As a Brazilian, I'd rather have Ukraine than Russia in BRICS. Of course EU is certainly more attractive.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I would rather not be a part of the BRICS tbh

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For sure! Until recently I didn't even know it has become some sort of official thing, I always thought that it was just an observation by economists that these 5 countries in particular were "ahead" of the other "developing" countries.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Has been an official thing for a long time now I believe, with meetings and such

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

And I only found out recently when other countries started talking about joining.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

Ukraine needs to be allowed to go weapons free in Russia proper, destroy their air defenses, then start hitting refineries and other high value targets throughout Russia and especially near Moscow. Then, peace talks can be productive.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

You know shit is serious when world leaders start slamming things

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The disrespect from Russia and China aside, I am.optimistic that attempts at peace talks are coming in.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The peace talks are DOA for the reasons stated quite clearly in the article. And frankly, this should surprise absolutely nobody. The proposals were demonstrably not serious, nor made in good faith - again, for reasons stated quite clearly in the article.