this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2022
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science

22876 readers
77 users here now

Welcome to Hexbear's science community!

Subscribe to see posts about research and scientific coverage of current events

No distasteful shitposting, pseudoscience, or COVID-19 misinformation.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Link to the paper in Science: Ancestry-inclusive dog genomics challenges popular breed stereotypes.

Environment and socialization remain the largest determining factor.

Unsurprisingly, most stereotypes about dog breeds are pseudoscience that come from the eugenics movement. In particular, “popular knowledge” around pitbulls and bulldogs is just thinly veiled racism.

interview on the study from the verge: https://www.theverge.com/2022/4/28/23043508/dog-breed-behavior-genetics-study-stereotypes

The research did find some genes associated with traits like human sociability and howling frequency. But overall, only around 9 percent of dog behavior was explained by breed.

“Dogs are individuals,” said Marjie Alonso, a study author and executive director of the International Association of Animal Behavior Consultants. “What a dog looks like is not really going to tell you what the dog acts like.”

Edit: modern “purebred” breeding literally came from eugenicists, that’s why this old political cartoon even exists. Documentary on pedigree dogs and their many issues: https://vimeo.com/166015460

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Awesome, I guess I can just own a husky in my apartment just like a chihuahua and not worry about it, because its breed characteristics of being high energy and needing physical exercise (even compared to similar sized dogs) were just make believe! I guess retrievers being gentle, shiba inus being willful, and pitbulls having strong latching tendencies is all just a collective delusion.

Dog breed characteristics are absolutely real, and even considering them comparable to human genetic behaviors is basically doing race science believers' work for them. "Behaviors" among humans are completely different than an instinct driven animal like a dog, which is why evopsych and race science shit are trash science.

Looking at the actual study, the problems that cause the obviously bogus result are:

  • They are going by survey responses. I can't even start to explain how this does nothing except aggregate beliefs. Who is gonna be like "oh yeah my sweet baby pitbull Cupcakes is extremely aggressive to other dogs and children and exhibits strong latching instinct!"
  • Dangerous dog breeds often attack instinctually in ways that are completely different than their socialized nature. If you say your dog has never done something, that's not the same as saying the dog doesn't have a tendency towards it.
  • They had to further muddle the data by trying to highlight a linear correspondence between breed DNA and reliability of that behavior. That's not how DNA works. For example, Corgi visual phenotypes are fairly dominant so breeding them with anything else will be guaranteed to look more like a Corgi. If you assume behavior is determined by DNA, the same idea applies.

If you want to insultingly compare this to human eugenic atrocities, then try going over to eastern Europe and do a survey of 20,000 people on what behaviors they've observed from different groups of people. Let me know how great the survey approach turns out there.

I think where this more likely applies is how every dog breed has a laundry list of ultraspecific behavioral tendencies that really tend to be nonsense in the same way wine tasting notes are often silly. They're way too specific and determined by limited subjective experience and bias. But you can absolutely identify broad characteristics among breeds.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They are going by survey responses. I can’t even start to explain how this does nothing except aggregate beliefs.

damning

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Look over the actual paper, that comment is not coherent. Also from an 8 day old account, so they're probably one of those dweebs who keeps getting banned for being insufferable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Look over the actual paper, that comment is not coherent

fta: "The study analyzed survey responses from nearly 20,000 dog owners about their dog’s behavior"

Also from an 8 day old account, so they’re probably one of those dweebs who keeps getting banned for being insufferable.

I'm guessing you've never been doxxed by chuds if you think rotating accounts is inherently sus

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I kinda agree that written survey stuff is pretty weak. But like everything else in our stupid lives, dog breeds have somehow become political. And people absolutely make snap judgements about breeds and their owners based on racist and classist assumptions. I would generally agree with a study that found training/upbringing has a stronger effect on breed behavior than genetics because otherwise there wouldn't be a whole subculture around rehabilitating dog rescues.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

If all dogs can be aggressive than most people still shouldn’t own large dogs because most people can’t train a dog worth shit. Everyone and their mother in my neighborhood owns a big ass pit mix which is fine except for the fact that they freak out anytime they see another dog on a walk because they’re not trained. My in laws used to have a great pyrennes that they refused to train until it almost took someone’s hand off. An untrained dachshund is a menace but any dog that you can pick up when it’s trying to attack the neighbors’ dogs isn’t really a problem. But that’s just me with a thing about big dogs because one took a piece out of my ear as a kid

Like my college friend has a lab mix rescue that’s insane and they refuse to acknowledge it. They live in a standard apartment building and because of unfortunate circumstances someone’s chihuahua walked out into the hallway as their dog passed their door and it actually picked it up and hat it in it’s mouth. That’s fucking horrifying. Don’t own these dogs if you can’t take care of them and can’t take care of the safety of other people around you. Cops use attack dogs for a reason

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's a good thing everyone is working 40+ hours a day and has no leisure time in which they could do something like train a dog.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Then maybe they shouldn't own an animal capable of maiming or killing people.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Then maybe they shouldn’t own an animal ~~capable of maiming or killing people.~~

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

:vegan-seitan: :inshallah-script:

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

To preface, I owned rottweilers, but I would never trust a pit bull. "That's anecdotal" yes it is. I'm staying the hell away from those fuckers. I don't know if it's genetic, or that pit bull owners are just fucked in the head, or can't take care of dogs responsibly, or something else entirely, but a fact is that most deathly incidents happen with pit bulls.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"We at Hexbear.net present to you the long awaited sequel to the outdoor cat struggle session."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

White people let go of eugenics challenge (IMPOSSIBLE)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

The research did find some genes associated with traits like human sociability and howling frequency.

Oh cool, that last part was the only even slight counter-argument I have. There's a youtube channel I like that's just a dog groomer grooming dogs, and the most reliable thing to expect is that if she's grooming a Husky, it'll start howling like mad.

All other dog breed stereotypes being bullshit is something I can easily accept.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

:shocked-pikachu: whaaaaaaaaat???

ive always suspected this, its just socially acceptable to be racist about animals who can't punch you in the mouth