this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
851 points (98.3% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35583 readers
517 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Just started getting this now. Hopefully it's some A/B testing that they'll stop doing, but I'm not holding my breath

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 278 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I hate how these kinds of messages never explain WHY. It's just "Do it. Do what we tell you." ๐Ÿ’€

[โ€“] [email protected] 122 points 1 month ago (4 children)

BOW TO YOUR MASTERS, AND SUCK OUR DICK!!!!

I remember 10 years ago looking at a calculator app in the android app store, and seeing the permissions. And thinking "WHY THE FUCK DOES A CALCULATOR NEED MY LOCATION, AND ACCESS TO MY PHONE CONTACTS???"

Fuck THAT.

[โ€“] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What dick? pretty sure it's fallen off from all the STD's.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago

For ads, tracking and spying of course.

[โ€“] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Probably because 99.999% of users already use JS and dedicating a web page to it is already more work than they needed to put into it

[โ€“] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think it's just to avoid explaining why, and how they harvest your data. That said, I also hate how a lot of errors of the big corpo are just like "This site has an error" no error-code, no further feedback what to do etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

Because they dont need to

load more comments (4 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 166 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Google is no longer a Search Engine. It is a commerce/purchase search. It's nothing more than ads and corporate results to purchase goods & services. Google Shopping has taken over Google.

load more comments (4 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 86 points 1 month ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 79 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

DuckDuckGo doesn't ;)

By the way, in my browser, the title of this post shows up as

Google now requires Javascript in c/mildlyinfuriating

which shocked me a little.

[โ€“] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sundar Pichai is the admin for this community, didn't you know?

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 67 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I know this may come off as a surprise: but I imagine that requiring JS in 2024 isn't a big deal to most people.

Now of course Lemmy skews more into that small crowd.

I don't blame any website for requiring JS for full functionality in 2024.

[โ€“] [email protected] 57 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Google is a text input and a list of links. It should work without JS.

load more comments (5 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (15 children)

All of the people replying to this saying you shouldn't need JS are totally unaware how modern web development works.

Yes, you could do many sites without JS, but the entire workforce for web development is trained with JS frameworks. To do otherwise would slow development time down significantly, not allow for certain functionality to exist (functionality you would 100% be unhappy was missing).

Its not a question of possibility, its a question of feasibility.

load more comments (15 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

For full functionality sure. For basic functionality no. Searching on Google is basic functionality I'd say.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 60 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I love that society is basically stratifying into groups based on tech knowledge - it all seems very Cyberpunk.

[โ€“] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (10 children)

As someone with technical knowledge sometimes I get locked out of things because I block ads or refuse Javascript. For instance, I had to turn off my pihole so I could sign into my Microsoft account to play Minecraft. Or the times I encounter a website that breaks on Firefox.

[โ€“] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Microsoft Minecraft login thing is getting pretty insane.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The more technology pervades society the more pronounced this will get. The sheer helplessness of people when faced with problems that seem trivial to some is scary. Especially when you see people losing final theses or critical work related data because they never learned about backups.

Add to that tech companies trying to hide the concept of a file system, and it seems like this is by design to sell more shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 57 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

You're still using Google search?

[โ€“] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sometimes, yeah. My default is DDG, and I also use Kagi, but Google is still good at some stuff. Guess I'll take the hit and just stop using it completely though. Kagi has been good enough, and also lets me search the fediverse for finding that dank meme I saw last week. Google used to be able to do that, but can't shove as many ads in those queries I assume, so they dropped that ability.

[โ€“] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Use the bangs in DDG, eg !g asks DDG to search google

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 52 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Yep. I use Noscript and DDG Lite by default. Just putting into duckduckgo: !g will search google without having to turn JS on...looks like Duckduckgo wins again, even when it comes to using google, lol.

load more comments (4 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Who still uses Google? DDG has been way better for a long while now. Join the duck side.

[โ€“] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago

So that's why it's so good at finding porn.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

Just use SearXNG.

[โ€“] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[โ€“] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I like the SearX search engine. It gives old-school, relevant search results, not google ranked ones.

https://search.inetol.net/

It's also spread out over many separate instances, so you can pick the one that best suits your search needs:

https://searx.space/

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Use LibreX or a fork called LibreY, it's a JS-free proxy for Google search

There's a list of instances at https://librey.org/instances.php

Something similar exists for DuckDuckGo btw, it's called 4get

Or you can just use SearXNG, a meta search engine that aggregates results from multiple sources

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

No offense intended, but why are you still using Google? Startpage has anonyomized results from Google. DuckDuckGo is good enough for most people as well. Brave search also exists if you don't mind supporting that shitty company.

[โ€“] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

lol. nope. not happening. that's not how to get me to even think about using your search again (having quit over a decade ago).

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

I've been happy with Qwant lately, they have their own index so using them doesn't support the Google + Bing hegemony. They're also EU based and regulated by the gdpr.

[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

why are you using google in 2024 grandpa

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] possiblylinux127 15 points 1 month ago

There are so many alternatives

[โ€“] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (5 children)

AFAIK Startpage gives you google results with your privacy intact and less ads.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next โ€บ