this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
88 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1373 readers
55 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

ChatGPT didn't nearly destroy her wedding, her lousy wedding planner did. Also whats she got against capital letters?

[–] [email protected] 58 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yea yea guns don't kill people, bullet impacts kill people. Dishonesty and incompetence are nothing new, but you may note that the wedding planner's unfounded confidence in ChatGPT exacerbated the problem in a novel way. Why did the planner trust the bogus information about Vegas wedding officiants? Is someone maybe presenting these LLM bots as an appropriate tool for looking up such information?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, even some influential people at my employer have started to peddle the idea that only “old-fashioned” people are still using Google, while all the forward-thinking people are prompting an AI. For this reason alone, I think that negative examples like this one deserve a lot more attention.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Bullet impacts don't kill people, tissue deorganization and fluid loss kill people!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's clearly a joke walking the first phrase they said a bit further, to an absurdly literal point.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

you couldn’t fucking help yourself could you

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 weeks ago

*What's

For the sin of making a grammar error in a post criticizing grammar you must now do ten push-ups.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

"Comment whose upvotes all come from programming dot justworks dot dev dot infosec dot works" sure has become a genre of comment.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Comments coming from .dev should default to comic sans.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago

holy shit this sounds like an amazing plugin

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

"I can safely bet that by 'all upvotes come from programming dot justworks dot dev dot infosec dot works' you actually mean 'a vast majority of upvotes come from these tech instances' even before reading your comment."

"Or in other words I correctly interpreted what you meant but apparently the way you said it is a problem because I prefer to blame users rather than peddlers."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Federating is a vector of disease

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How can you tell who up votes a comment?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

instance admins have a button for it

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I can make a safe assumption before reading the article that ChatGPT didn't ruin the wedding, but rather somebody that was using ChatGPT ruined the wedding.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

"blame the person, not the tools" doesn't work when the tools' marketing team is explicitly touting said tool as a panacea for all problems. on the micro scale, sure, the wedding planner is at fault, but if you zoom out even a tiny bit it's pretty obvious what enabled them to fuck up for as long and as hard as they did

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

what if the person in question is also a tool

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

oh gods they're multiplying

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

why would you say something so inane my god

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

do you think they ever got round to reading the article, or were they spent after coming up with “hmmmm I bet chatgpt didn’t somehow prompt itself” as if that were a mystery that needed solving

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I had to take a nap after my profound thoughts.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

wankery will do that to a man

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"ChatGPT is good, but only if no one in a position of authority uses it"

Cool.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"This hammer can't plan a wedding. Hammers are useless."

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

almost all of your posts are exactly this worthless and exhausting and that’s fucking incredible

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

As a fellow Interesting Wedding Haver, I have to give all the credit in the world to the author for handling this with grace instead of, say, becoming a terrorist. I would have been proud to own the "Tracy did nothing wrong" tshirt.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Credit to her for making the best of a bad situation. "We almost couldn't get legally married, so we had to bring in Elvis to officiate the paperwork after the ceremony" is going to be a top-tier wedding story for every party going forward.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

good thing Elvis is everywhere

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

As long as music is alive, so is The King. A-thank you. Thank you very much.