this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
412 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

58813 readers
4632 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A satellite belonging to multinational service provider Intelsat mysteriously broke up in geostationary orbit over the weekend.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago

Did it happen to have a beeper?

[–] [email protected] 213 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It was probably a whistleblower satellite.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That satellite was about to reveal company secrets

[–] [email protected] 39 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The secret is that Boeing is run by criminally careless assholes. Wait, that's not a secret.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Boeing killed John Barnett.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

puts on conspiracy hat

Did musk hit it with something?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

Nah, it obviously wanted to whistlelbow about Boeing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 156 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (5 children)

Surprised Pikachu face...

IS-33e was the second satellite to be launched as part of Boeing's "next generation" EpicNG platform. The first, dubbed IS-29e, failed due to a propulsion system fuel leak.

I see a pattern.

[–] [email protected] 145 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

Hmm, sounds like Boeing needs to fire more engineers.

And increase C-level compensation, of course.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Exactly why I wonder where our business school ethics go when it seems to me that value is only placed on what can be tied to everyone's income and profit being the 'sole' provider for it, and any Engineer's ethics being a nice thing for their own time. What would happen if we switch it up to Engineers being in charge who actually learn to make the product and the business side being the client of it rather than the other way around? Could the world be a better place? This doesn't mean every engineer or either group as a monolith is good or bad. Just that maybe in economics we can see who may value externalities even in capitalism as Adam Smith seemed to promote over just profit.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

There really is no other option.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Just gonna throw this idea out there:

What if they hired a bunch of engineers who graduated from sketchy, unaccredited colleges in foreign countries and paid them half as much much?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

Then we can give bigger bonuses! What a genius idea.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Of course there is! They could spend more money in PR campaigns and ~bribes~ lobbying

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago

You need double ~~tides~~ tildes for the cross out text to work

[–] [email protected] 15 points 13 hours ago

I don't know this smells of some pencil Pusher looking at an engineer going "can you bring the cost of that rubber o-ring down 13 cents"... "I know you were looking for a specific type of seal but I got this huge assortment pack right here from my local temu...."

[–] [email protected] 11 points 13 hours ago

Well, it is public knowledge that layoffs and furloughs are happening, so sadly, you're not wrong.

And they somehow enticed Kelly Ortberg out of retirement to take over as CEO. There's the hella juicy c-suite compensation package you talked about. He was already riding golden after he maneuvered that Rockwell Collins sale/merger/whatever.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 15 hours ago

And do some more stock buybacks and raise dividends, of course.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

An epic pattern my be on the horizon?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

If it hadnt exploded into peices,what would it havr exploded into instead?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 12 hours ago

To shreds you say

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

Regulations

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 16 hours ago (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 15 hours ago

I guess space is technically out of the environment.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They thought it did ... so they tried turning it off then on again ... and it exploded.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 15 hours ago

"Did it pass the smoke test?"

"Kinda... There's no smoke, anyway..."

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

IS-33e was the second satellite to be launched as part of Boeing's "next generation" EpicNG platform. The first, dubbed IS-29e, failed due to a propulsion system fuel leak. Intelsat declared the satellite a total loss in April 2019, later attributing it to either a micrometeoroid strike or solar weather activity.

What caused IS-33e to break up in orbit remains unclear, however. Intesalt officials did observe that it was using far more fuel than it should be to maintain its orbit shortly after launching eight years ago, shaving off 3.5 years of its 15-year lifetime.

Boeing produces more leaks than this guy:

[–] [email protected] 12 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

I was on a Boeing plane the other day that was delayed while we watched a guy with a wrench and a rag trying to stop fuel leaking out of the wing. It wasn't hugely reassuring.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Nowadays when I fly the fiirst criteria when I search for flights I check the airline's fleet, then price.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago

At least it was outside. Better out than in, I always say

[–] [email protected] 37 points 16 hours ago

Another Unsafe Product, Brought To You By Boeing!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

J E W I S H. S P A C E. L A S E R S!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 14 hours ago

So now this satellite can be an "anomaly" for another satellite, and the circle of life continues...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 12 hours ago

It was the window seal.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

That's gonna leave a mess.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 15 hours ago

Fortunately, Boeing is a responsible entity and will plan on cleaning it up... right?

img

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 14 hours ago

So in addition to the Boeing low hanging fruit - feels like the opener to a scifi story involving either covert space weapons testing or the start to some kind of extraterrestrial invasion. 😁

[–] [email protected] 10 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

There's not really a threat in geostationary orbits. It's a much bigger area with far fewer satellites.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago

That's not good. —Subtitle

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago

You can't make this shit up lmao.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›