this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
82 points (95.6% liked)

PC Gaming

8442 readers
677 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 hours ago

How is he supposed to make line go up if no free government moneys?

[–] [email protected] 69 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

This reticence to give out CHIPS Act funding right away apparently stemmed from fears from the government that Intel specifically would not meet its promises. “[There is fear that] Intel is going to take chips money, build an empty shell of a factory and then never actually open it, because they don’t have customers,” said former Commerce Department official Caitlin Legacki.

Honestly this seems like rare reasonable move by the federal government.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago

Thanks. I was hoping someone would shed light in the comments.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, 'take the money, build an empty factory' is what tech companies do when you give them a money helicopter.

Maybe we should stop giving them any money and just nationalize these failed businesses that need bailouts? (Yes, yes, Intel isn't failed - yet - but my point is still valid.)

If they're important to the national security or whatever, then they're important enough to go through that process for too.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago

"We took your $8.5 billion and instead of building 8.5 billion dollars worth of extra capacity, we built the capacity we were in the process of building anyway and used 8.5 billion dollars of our money to buy back stock"

[–] [email protected] 54 points 17 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 29 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Now he knows how us regular people feel when we have to fight insurance and the doctor’s billing office to get them to code/process the claim correctly and keep calling to bug them for the refund check and it still takes over a year. Welcome to the real word.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I mean, I guess he gets a tiny fraction of that, since this won't ruin his company or him financially for the rest of his life if it doesn't work out, nor does he actually put in the work any further than a phone call that his assistant sets up. The rest is all done by various departments, all he does is wait for an email saying it's been recieved.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 16 hours ago

That’s a great point. Don’t want the poor whittle CEOs to have to actually do any work for their ridiculous salaries.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

this won't ruin his company or him financially for the rest of his life if it doesn't work out

It wouldn't be the only thing but I think there's a nonzero chance that something like this is one key step in a spiral that forces Intel into bankruptcy. Their inability to get their foundry business off the ground currently threatens their long term prospects, and if they get stuck in a place where the government won't trust them because they don't have customers, and the customers won't trust them because they don't have the money, then that might truly lead to the end of the company, with his business decisions taught in business schools as a case study.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The U.S. government put some objectives between CHIPS Act recipients and their money, with milestones including completing building projects, securing customers, etc. “Obviously, with elections, you know, nigh in front of us, hey, we want this done,” said Gelsinger, with the possibility of a new presidential regime lighting a fire of urgency.

Imagine having to do something for your 8.5 billion fucking dollars.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Why won't the government just give them the money and trust that they'll do what they said? It worked out great paying companies to roll out fiber years ago, that's why we're all on reliable, high speed fiber internet today.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 14 hours ago

As someone who works in the telecommunications industry, look up RDOF.

Not only is it a HUGE timeline that does nothing to incentivize actually completing a project early, but the main RDOF winner in my area has only wireless service available with zero construction projects planned except to put up more wireless equipment.

It also means those areas that company claims they’ll serve one day are ineligible for any more grant money and now that companies that are willing to bring fiber to those homes have to pay a boatload out of pocket while the RDOF winner just hangs out and watches.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine having to Actually do something instead of just saying we plan to do this, money plz.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, what are these guys? Cable companies?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm so sick of these welfare queens crying all the time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

They even kill babies (startup competitors). They don't deserve the handout.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 19 hours ago

Has he tried to stop sucking?

Maybe just admit that the only reason he's still the CEO of anything is because of DOD contracts and STFU.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 16 hours ago

Get in line intel I'm still waiting for my 1200 from covid

[–] [email protected] 14 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Grown man on his knees begging

[–] [email protected] 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Grown man on his knees "begging"

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

'Tis the season (Locktober)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Looks like he don't think Trump is going to pay.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago

Yeah. I can understand being nervous that Putin won't approve spending money on national defense investments.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 16 hours ago

Lets not pay them a dime and then nationalize them lol

[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago

"My simple message is, 'Boost share price before I get shown the door,'" said Gelsinger in an interview with the New York Times.