Welcome to the ultimate rabbit hole! Enjoy your journey. Let me say, with a healthy amount of unearned confidence, that I think your conception of the 1st is a little off. Everything is always changing, it's just that frame of reference is what makes it APPEAR to be constant. If something seems to be unchanging, a step back will show that not only is the original thing changing, but the observer is changing along with it. Great thing about all of this is, if you ever find yourself with nothing to think about, or you need the ultimate distraction, physics will always give you something else to think about. Enjoy the journey! 🙂
this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
-1 points (33.3% liked)
Anything_Tested
49 readers
1 users here now
Rules :
0 - server’s rules
. TLDR :
- be civilized
- follow the law of civilized country
1 - no more rules
2 - it's forbidden to forbid
3 - anyone, not only moderators, can post to this community. ( until something goes verry wrong ! )
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
in my post header you will find a link to the original post. This place is for my personal archiving and testing.
Nevertheless, if I follow what you are saying here you mean to say : by changing frame of references we can violate conservation of energy ...or am I missing something ?
Please, let us move this conversation under the main post at :
https://lemmy.ca/post/5016031
I always think of it as:
1st law: The quantity of energy never changes
2nd law: The quality of energy is constantly degrading (aka entropy is increasing)
This is a very good formulation and completely in line with current physics...
...from which I am trying to break away a little bit !
Please, let us move this conversation under the main post at : https://lemmy.ca/post/5016031