this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
210 points (97.7% liked)

Terrible Estate Agent Photos

6907 readers
2 users here now

Terrible photos listed by estate agents/realtors that are so bad they’re funny.

Posting guidelines.

Posts in this community must be of property (inside or out) listed for sale which contains a terrible element. “Terrible” can refer to:

Rules.

This community follows the rules of the feddit.uk instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago

'Priced below land value', because the fire-~~gutted~~ kissed structure will cost a shitload to bulldoze and remove.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

MINIMAL fire/smoke damage

Let me show you what minimal fire/smoke damage looks like

The minimum is zero

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

3rd base involves kissing, of sorts

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t know why, but that chair makes things so much funnier.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

This is fine

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Lightly-toasted.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

If this is fire kissed, I'd hate to see fire fucked.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Smokey flavoring

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

No way. 🤣🤣

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The studs are probably mostly good and it just needs some renovation. Those who aren't in construction would have a hard time seeing the potential.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay, I'm honestly curious about this, as I saw another listing similar to this where they said something similar about the studs being intact, and it just seemed like an absolute joke give the house was missing the entire roof and seemed to basically just be the framing, yet was listed for about $200k less than surrounding homes. Just seems kind of crazy to have to have to worry about that and deal with the material and labor costs of all of that plus the fact that it'll be known the house was severely fire damaged at some point. I know basically nothing about the subject, but it's just difficult for me to comprehend that being a better move than just tearing it down and rebuilding.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Typically when you build with the existing frame, you don't need to re-permit for the framing which will have to be brought up to existing code. So the cost would be less.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

A smokey Cajun taste to the home!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Cleansed by the holy flame.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

1300 for a burnt apartment? Nutjobs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This reminds me of our home that was next to a burntout shell.

We had "smoke and water damage" (the flames were in our attic) and that required a year to repair with months to dry out the water, reskimming the walls with new plaster, etc...

Ah, good times

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Fire ~~kissed~~ fucked right up the ass.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Mostly dead duplex