this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
434 points (98.9% liked)

News

23664 readers
3582 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A Delaware judge upheld her earlier decision to void Elon Musk’s $56 billion Tesla CEO pay package, ruling it was improperly granted due to Musk’s control over Tesla and flawed board negotiations.

Tesla’s attempt to overturn the ruling through a shareholder vote was rejected, with the judge warning against revising judgments with new facts post-trial.

Musk called the ruling “absolute corruption” and plans to appeal.

Meanwhile, Musk’s net worth has surged, driven by Tesla’s stock jump following optimism about his alignment with Trump’s policies.

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 101 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Good to see.

this probably hurts him more than me saying he's an incompetent nepo baby. (the best way to hurt rich fucks is to hurt their wallet, after all.)

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

the best way to hurt rich fucks is

with a guillotine.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

The guillotine was actually meant to be painless. Properly constructed and sharpened it pretty much is. Or so I’m told.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Eh, I think all those pain receptors in your neck will send signals to your brain just fine, for a while.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

maybe you have a point. But can I loot all his money first and make him watch as i donate it to trans rights, maybe also some no-kill shelters. you know puppies and kittens. also, maybe end homelessness and take a bite out of world hunger?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Nah, the sudden loss of blood pressure sends you into shock immediately.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The brain is alive for minutes afterwards so don't know what it would feel like.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Bit of an unsubstantiated myth that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, it's a testable hypothesis, and we've got plenty of oligarchs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah go for it. There's science to be done, for the people that are still alive

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Reckon we should find out, using musk with a neurolink embedded

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

While a quick and painless death certainly falls short of the misery they cause, I'm more concerned about ending that misery to the masses; it's not so much about punishing the oppressors. ...even if they do deserve to be skinned alive and then drowned in a pool of lemon juice; that's just more work than it's worth.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Unfortunately his wallet isn’t hurting. He’s still rich.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

So what you're saying is, more hurt!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think hurting his ego also hurts him, just look at the amount of people that get banned from X for doing it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Dang, so instead of deleting my account I should've got it banned... That would've been better

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

That sum is close to the 44 billion spent on Twitter, could that somehow be the payment for it via inflating Tesla stock price?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Probably? I'm fairly certain that saying mean things about Musk on Lemmy has no effect on him whatsoever.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You’re right. I’d say mean things about him on twitter, but that requires a twitter account… and that’s just gross.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Temporarily have a Twitter account because Leon doesn't like people saying mean things about him.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

I do like knowing that anywhere that assclown's name comes up (or other deserving parties), somebody will chime in with an insult or five. He'll never see it in almost any conceivable universe but on the off chance that this is the one where he's browsing [email protected] comments, at least we can make sure they're not all neutral or positive.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I just leave one quote here:

According to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, it would cost $20 billion to end homelessness in the United States.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Here is a fun fact, if every church housed 2 homeless people, there would be no homeless in America.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

As if a church would give a damn about the needy.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Excellent comment. I donated to Coalition for the Homeless in your name.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Hey thank you, I feel honored!

[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Wasn't happy with the last ones what was it like 42?

Fuck this guy so fucking hard.

People don't understand.

If $50bn was stacked $10 bills, it'd be real high up neat. But if it was ripped over and on the ground... .it'd take OVER 10 HOURS AT HIGHWAY SPEEDS to drive its length.

For reference $1m would be like 20 parking spaces in $1 bills.

So... Like... Fuck man.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Elon Musk's wealth is listed as about $337,000,000,000. If you earn $50K per year it would take you 6.74 million years to earn it, or 3.37 million years at $100K. If you earned a million dollars a year it would still take you 337,000 years. It's an obscene amount of wealth to belong to one man.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

This is what I mean when I try to explain to people that if they're not pulling down multiple millions of dollars per year on the interest of their wealth..

They are the middle class. And they're basically poor.

This shit is slipping fast.

If you have a salary that's in the hundreds of thousands and you think that you're doing well? You're just not very poor. You're basically a slave. You're a slave with bells and whistles.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you have a salary that’s in the hundreds of thousands and you think that you’re doing well? You’re just not very poor. You’re basically a slave. You’re a slave with bells and whistles.

Poor isn't a measure of wealth compared to others. It also means "with less resources than you need to survive in a healthy way". For most people $100k/year will let you survive in a healthy way. Above a certain dollar figure, having more money doesn't let you live better, it just gets spent on unnecessary crap (or stacked up and hoarded).

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

In the short-term: yes.

In the mid- to long-term: obscene inequality (like we are seeing currently) inevitably leads to awful awful things....

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

If you have a salary that's in the hundreds of thousands and you think that you're doing well?

If you have that salary, then you can have a comfortable life. And if you have a comfortable life, then you are doing well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

If you have a salary that’s in the hundreds of thousands and you think that you’re doing well? You’re just not very poor. You’re basically a slave. You’re a slave with bells and whistles.

No wonder people are so miserable if they believe someone earning 100k+ a year means they're poor. In the vast majority of places in the world that puts you well into the upper middle class. I earn less than half that and I consider myself quite well off.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

I highly recommend On Freedom book but Timothy Snyder, it basically talks how the wealth is being stolen from us and now with help of modern technology like social media.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

It boggles my mind why anyone would still be holding onto Tesla stock right now. The board and the Musk are actively trying to screw them over right now and one judge barely managed to prevent shareholders from getting shafted. How does it make any sense to hold onto Tesla shares at this point?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Because he's going to make money hand over fist when Trump's "road safety" department allows Tesla to operate unsafe robo taxis.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If those robo taxes are working off of similar system to their half baked self driving tech, it would be a disaster. I keep seeing videos of Waymo taxis clogging up the streets of San Francisco and those things have much better suite of sensors than Tesla. It's insane that our public road has become a alpha/beta testing platform for bunch of tech bros.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

It's OK, they'll have a fully qualified team of crack operatives, ready to take over if the car needs human assistance!

And by that they mean a guy in Bangalore, being paid $1 an hour to stare at 20 screens all day, hoping to Vishnu that he doesn't kill anybody today.

I'm assuming that it's the same shitty self driving tech they have now, only instead of you sat there ready to take over when it decides it can't be bothered or veers into oncoming traffic, some other poor schmuck will be doing it instead. Only with an extra second of latency.

People will die.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That is the company than owns and operates the US president elect. People are going to shovel money into that as long as morons think Trump is doing a good job

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

Tesla stocks (and quite a few other company's stocks) are not based on 'fundamentals'. They are based on hype, speculation, and perceived future value.

People investing in tesla either 1. Are 'playing the game' and trying to take advantage of the hype. Which incentives them to also hype because they benefit when more people buy the stock. Think crypto bro-esque grifting. Id also throw in people who do short term trading to time hype jumps. 2. Novice/uninformed investors who don't understand fundamentals (who may be getting boozled)3. People that understand fundamentals but are also hedging against a miracle.

Elon isn't a stupid guy. There is a reason why Musk is constantly hyping things. It keeps the stock high. It's keeps the buzz going which gets more people to buy in. It keeps him rich which lets him do silly things like buying Twitter or donating to political campaigns and ingratiating him to the president elect.

But the overall valuation of Tesla absolutely, unequivocally is not based on fundamentals/realistic valuation of the company. It's almost all a "bet" and people buying stocks are gambling.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Market is irrational

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

When you've essentially already got everything the only thing to do is try to get more.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago

Every rich person has a hoarding mental illness

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

ruling that Musk had individually “controlled Tesla” and dictated the terms of his compensation to a board that didn’t fairly negotiate.

I'd like like to know more about the makeup of this "board" who I assume were all hand picked by Musk.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago