this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
64 points (80.2% liked)

Harry Potter

882 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

And it really irks me a lot.

Update: Man, I have gotten tons of great responses here and a lot of activity. The comments section turned out way better than Reddit. Thank you all! <3

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought it was all so far fetched that they just kept on allowing obviously evil people, people who were opposed to the very ideals of the school, continue with their plots unchallenged. Then 2020 rolled around and I was like "oh... Well this feels familiar".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This one bothered me pretty early. But I don't feel like the context given in the Harry Potter series would allow for anything like the corruption we see in real-life politics. For one, a couple people are professors of Hogwarts for power, but most are in it because they care about their jobs. There's no reason nobody stood up to Dolores— all students and professors hated her (except her new toady Filch, and maybe only a few Slytherin after she offered them power?) and Dolores was exerting power over the school that she simply didn't have. Any one of them could have just effed her up anytime for her literal, no joke Nazi rules and her torture. Let alone a full disgruntled school.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Wasn't she empowered by the ministry of magic, which was in turn controlled by money?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Examples? You can't go on a rant and then not give examples.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Sirius' death is a pretty obvious example

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Hey look, there it is again in the one I’m at now. Hermoine to Potter: “What’s wrong with your hand?” Potter: “Nothing.” (This was the Dolores torture). Hermoine actually finds out, which is refreshing. "You've got to tell Dumbledore." Harry: "No. Dumbledore's got enough on his mind right now." Freaking stupid, Harry.

This “is anything happening?” “No, nothing.” exchange with Potter is constant in this series.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Dude the ball tops of my thigh bones were literally sliding off the bones (they failed to fuse for me) in middle school. I was limping and would have insane attacks if pain when they moved a fraction of a millimeter.

Parents, teachers, friends: what's wrong? Me: nothing

Kids hiding bad things is the most real part.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

People hide important things for dumb reasons in the real world, but it's unsatisfying, lazy and overused in fiction. Especially in HP.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh no no.... I was the opposite. I was a whiny little bitch. Broke a finger nail? "Moooooooooom!!!!"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Most kids don't hide blatant injuries or health problems people are just trying to cope with bad writing.

Hate this fucking site it's full of contrarian bullshit just like reddit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I cannot overstate how much not only does Harry do it every movie, but all the other characters as well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"Kids hiding bad things is the most real part".

You're watching a story set from the kids point of view. We (the audience) aren't privvy to what the adults/teachers are doing, just like the kids.

And from Harry's perspective, he's got a lot going on, and this is just "another removed teacher". Keep in mind this is a Brit story - ask a Brit what their schooling was like (had some insightful discussions 20 years ago with my older Brit coworkers).

JK was what, 30-40 when she wrote this? So went to school in the 70's.

Lol, I love the "removed" bot. It almost makes things taste better!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Give me a break man. I was sick for most of my childhood. You know what I did? I told my parents when I was getting sick. I guess that must be a shock to the morons in this thread trying to pretend that kids are utter dumbasses so they don't have to criticize a story.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Plus, Harry would naturally have a distrust of authority figures due to his upbringing. I'm sure he got used to hiding stuff from the Dursleys.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Dumbledore thought Harry was a Horcrux mate, he was avoiding him since the start of the year.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I couldn't finish book 6 because there was too much of harry whining in capslock for no appreciable reason, and I remember skipping over a lot of scenes with his uncle for the exact reasons OP highlights.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

He had PTSD, he watched a kid get murdered and nearly got murdered!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Fair point. But I can't remember it all at once. I didn't exactly stop and take notes every few seconds throughout the movies like a proper reviewer xD

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But if you say that "most of bad things" I would imagine it wouldn't be too hard to name a few

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm autistic. Big hard drive, small RAM. And that RAM is being used right now to absorb this next Harry Potter movie while I also try to manage funds with my housemates in a crisis and prevent homelessness

I'd basically have to go and rewind right now, or go back to the movies I watched in the last week, and... blegh, I don't want to stop in the middle of the first third of Order of the Phoenix. It's already way better than Goblet of Fire (movies, not books. People say the GoF book is great, and I tend to believe them)

Edit: Hey look, there it is again in the one I’m at now. Hermoine to Potter: “What’s wrong with your hand?” Potter: “Nothing.” (This was the Dolores torture). Hermoine actually finds out, which is refreshing. "You've got to tell Dumbledore." Harry: "No. Dumbledore's got enough on his mind right now." Freaking stupid, Harry.

This “is anything happening?” “No, nothing.” exchange with Potter is constant in this series.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would like to highlight Harry's character development throughout the series. Although he made several questionable choices in GOF, OOF, and HBP, we should consider that he is a teenager throughout most of the series. Teenagers, umm, well, aren't great decision-makers. As a teenager, I mostly acted mainly on impulse instead of rational thinking.

And talking about individuals defending themselves, not all perspectives find a receptive audience. A perfect example is in OOF, when Dumbledore testifies before the Minister of Magic about Voldemort's return. His statements are met with scepticism and disbelief, mirroring a similar experience Harry had trying to convince others at Hogwarts.

If you want to share counter-examples, I'd be happy to hear them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Nobody ever explained anything more than the likes of "Voldemort's back! You have to believe me!" If anyone actually gave account or explained anything at all, the good guys would have a lot more allies than they do. Hell, actually talking is how they convinced a bunch of people to let Harry teach them dark arts defense in Order of the Phoenix. It seems that actually talking is how every good event happens, and that not talking is how every bad event happens.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

I call it "plot by stupid" but TV tropes calls it idiot plot. https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/IdiotPlot

Tbh, it's always kinda confused me why hp got such acclaim. They're decent books! I enjoyed reading them several times. However, I wouldn't call them hallmarks of fiction or anything.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yep! It's basically a form of bad writing.

There's something called an idiot plot, where the plot only works because the characters are idiots. If they just did the obviously correct thing, the tension would resolve too quickly.

It's a much harder task to create drama and tension from believable, likable, sensible, consistent characters. If your characters just CAPSLOCK ANGST DRAMA in every situation, it's way easier to keep tension. Annoying, badly written tension.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, kids, especially pre-teen to teen, are idiots. I know, because I was one. And my friends and classmates were too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

are idiots

It's true that people do dumb things, but it makes for annoying fiction. The real world doesn't always translate well into a story.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I felt the same way by the end of the series.

What bothered me even more was the number of situations that could have been solved with a cell phone or computer.

Like the world-building is absolutely busted. They even have these big-ass libraries and put all this emphasis on learning, but they haven't even started to digitize.

Never once saw a middle-school or teenaged student in a standard math or science class. Weasley's dad was the only one that even thought "muggle stuff" was interesting, but he understood about as well as Ariel understood forks.

Bunch of illiterate magic-dependent isolationists that can't do math or use Google Search. Dumbledore would shit a brick if he found out Hogwarts was on Google Earth that whole time.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The books are set between 1980 and 1998.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wonder how old Mr Poopy is? lol.

I see the joke, but honestly I could only tell be rereading the third paragraph. The rest sounds authentic.

It's one way to increase engagement on Lemmy lol.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Harry Potter happened before Google even existed. Google Earth would probably just look like a mundane splotch and people would look at it and suddenly remember they left the oven on. They learn their basic studies before they turn 11 and go to Hogwarts.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You have to be joking, right?

I'm not a fan of the series, and I haven't even read or watched it.

I do remember some "flying car" scene, which I'm guessing was flying by magic. But the model looked like from the 1950's.

So if the series happened in that era, there was no "digitizing books" happening anywhere.

Edit: I just read your whole comment. Yeah, you're joking. Funny!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ya' know, maybe voldemort would have maybe been able to take over at least one high school if he realised he could owl-mail a pipe bomb instead of all these cartoonish ritual shit.

EDIT: Or just portkey two subcritical halves of an enriched uranium weapon from two seperate places into destinations right next to each other so it forms one supercritical mass when they arrive. Where to get the uranium? Transfigure it of course.

You know what, just get ron's creepy manrat pet to transfigure the whole thing on site. For bonus kek don't tell him about the explosion that usually follows.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

That issue is common in literature (my spouse and I call it "Shakespeare's Disease"), as it gives a simple excuse for plot to happen.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Happens in a lot of media unfortunately

load more comments
view more: next ›