If you want the MacOS experience, install Garuda. Personally, I hate that global menu, and the first thing I do on a fresh install is get rid of it, but if that's what you like...
It's KDE, not GNOME, though.
this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
10 points (61.9% liked)
Linux
48732 readers
947 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Because it's not Plasma 6.
Gnome emulates MacOS in the worst ways possible. See: all the whitespace in gtk apps.
Because Linux doesnt compete with MacOS? Linux doesnt compete against any other OS because unlike Windows or MacOS, Linux isnt owned by a for-profit organization (Linux doesnt have something to sell). Gnome is driven by community efforts to polish a community maintained set of tools, I would say theyve done a very good job.
Indeed great work!
As others have said, it is not entirely clear what you mean by sharp. Based on the rounded corner and button example you gave previously, I think it might just be the graphic design. MacOS has had a lot of time invested into its design language including subtle things like a thin, almost glass-like specular border around windows and then a drop shadow. This very much becomes a matter of taste in many cases, but for some it helps identify boundaries more precisely. Perhaps have a look at https://github.com/vinceliuice/WhiteSur-gtk-theme, which replicates MacOS as closely as possible. You may be able to experiment with it side by side and see if you can figure out exactly what design element it is that you are looking for.
If you want a nice looking distro with some interesting features try Nitrux: nxos.org
immutable. So, no, sorry.
What speaks against immutable? Had bazzite for gaming for a while that was realy nice.
Have you tried theming gnome? There's a ton of videos on youtube if you're a beginner, i wonder if you'll have the same thoughts after theming it
Please have a look at my current desktop.
Do yourself a favor and ditch GNOME for KDE. You'll be glad you did. Especially if you're into theming.
I tried to do that a little while ago, but I just couldn't get used to the Menu on kde. Even with themes, it was miles behind ArcMenu on gnome.
I find Gnome smoother than macOS.
This wasn't the case many years ago, but now I find Gnome pretty good, the amount of bugs are surprisingly low.
On the other hand, I experience glitches on macOS regularly on the UI, especially on a multi-monitor setup (I use both Gnome and macOS with multiple monitors).
And generally feature-wise I find Gnome a lot more convenient to use in terms of window or workspace management.
I had the same with macOS. Sometime, more often after updates i had several bugs. With gnome never.
On the other hand, I experience glitches on macOS regularly on the UI, especially on a multi-monitor setup (I use both Gnome and macOS with multiple monitors).
Multi monitor and window tiling on Mac are so bad, they should be embarrassed.
You have to click to switch monitors but if you do it twice it registers as a double click so you have to click....wait...then click again.
Sometimes you can drag windows from one screen to the other and other times they just...disappear as you drag then across.
You can't close anything from the window buttons and the red and yellow buttons do the same thing. You have to go into the taskbar and right click to close them.
Then they took the time in Sequoia to add window tiling but it's just such an awful experience. You have to hover over the green dot and wait for the prompt to popup and choose from a drop-down menu. WHY CAN'T YOU JUST DRAG AND DROP!?
You have to click to switch monitors but if you do it twice it registers as a double click so you have to click…wait…then click again.
You don't switch monitors, you switch windows. That is how it works for all windows. It's like that so you can click anywhere in a window to focus it without activating something in the window by accident.
You can’t close anything from the window buttons and the red and yellow buttons do the same thing. You have to go into the taskbar and right click to close them.
You can close windows with the red window button, and the yellow button minimizes a window. Absolutely not the same thing. The whole application you can close via the dock, or the menu bar, or cmd+q. Two different things.
Some apps have a single main window though which will reopen when the dock icon is clicked (e.g. Mail), but that is still different to what the yellow minimize button does. The distinction is much more useful for document style apps like TextEdit which can have multiple windows (or none, if no file is open). There is also Hide which hides the entire application and all its windows until it's activated again.
Then they took the time in Sequoia to add window tiling but it’s just such an awful experience. You have to hover over the green dot and wait for the prompt to popup and choose from a drop-down menu. WHY CAN’T YOU JUST DRAG AND DROP!?
You can absolutely drag and drop to tile windows, and there are also keyboard shortcuts for it. Check the Window -> Move & Resize menu for that.
You don't switch monitors, you switch windows.
Well, theoretically yes. On a Mac, no.
It's like that so you can click anywhere in a window to focus it without activating something in the window by accident.
Why would I want to do that? Why does double-clicking suddenly remove that need?
You can close windows with the red window button
No you can't. It just minimizes them. Just like the yellow button.
You can absolutely drag and drop to tile windows
Like I said, sometimes you can, sometimes you can't. Apple does not give any fucks about consistency or intuitive design.
and there are also keyboard shortcuts for it
- Apple keyboard shortcuts are often 3 different keys for some stupid reason
- I shouldn't need them. Dragging and dropping the window should tile them just like it has in Windows for as long as I've been alive.
Gnome is just as beautiful as MacOS. The only difference is that MacOS is colorful, while Gnome is more b&w in its design. In fact, I'd say that gnome is more modern than macOS in its overall design philosophy. So modern, that some people hate it, lol. But modern nonetheless.
I recently started using the openbar extension which adds a lot of color to Gnome with just a few clicks.
I love Gnomes design btw. My second favorite after Android.
Sharp as, it looks blurry or sharp as, its not polished?
Ahh good hint. Not polished. Windows could be more beautyful for example.
@[email protected] i get what you saying. but as i lack experience with distros i find it interesting. can you add a few more examples of polished like how?
for example the corner on the left. Buttons somehow look better.
macOS gives the the feeling of sharpnes. Im so sorry its so difficult for me to discripe it.
yes, i get it. it's sort of a thing that my brain can't describe either, but want to hear someone go about it continuously to get it better.
It's transparency and blur, gnome favors performance over looks (not that it looks bad), you can get the same look on gnome if u theme it
I'm still unsure if you mean sharp as in clear, crisp high resolution / not pixelated / not blurry or "better" design / ui(x).
If the first check (fractional) scaling settings / font anti aliasing / smoothing options (I don't use Gnome so don't know where), if the latter, one is a small team of probably underpaid devs (Gnome), the other one of the wealthiest companies in the world (Apple) so I'd sure hope Apple's UI is "better" than Gnome's (though looking at Windows it doesn't seem like having money equals good design, lol).
Yes also the gtk thing. Maybe what i search is that all software ui's should follow a better design template? But i understand the feedback for ui freedom.
Part of using GNOME (at least to me) is expanding on the interface and building a personal experience through extensions.
Cover-flow when and-tabbing? Extension. Dynamic opacity of top bar? Extension. Wiggly-wobbly effects when dragging or minimising/maximising windows? Extension. Installing custom themes? Guess what, that's an extension too!
I think you understand where this is going.
In terms of polish (looking sharp), GNOME is the best on linux, still it can look much better in terms of eye candy if you add extensions. I think I have like 50+ extensions myself.
Thanks good feedback
Alright. Let's have it. What's the extensions that enhance the look of Gnome, propelling it into eye-candy heaven?
Im using this but suggestions would be helpful:
KDE Plasma may be a lot more customizable than Gnome, so you might be able to find something more like what you are looking for there. I would do a web search for varied examples if I were you.
You could search for more Gnome examples too. I believe Gnome requires more in the way of plugins for customization, so you might have to seek out examples of gnome plugins that customize look and feel or window styling. I'm just speculating here, I don't really know Gnome very well.
I will force me to test KDE for a longer therm. Thanks for the feedback.
Are you using fractional scaling?
No.
You won't get the same united look in Gnome as in mac OS. Applications will look a bit different and not exactly the same.
I think you get used to it though. I don't think about it at all anymore.
Not really true if you just stick to modern GTK apps. Almost always if you find a program for a specific purpose using Qt (KDE graphical framework) someone's make a program for the exact same function. Is it basically pointless other than keeping theming and style consistent? Yes, but that's enough for me unless there truly is an essential function missing. Basically the only Qt application I use is Strawberry Music Player because it's extremely featureful.
And then there's kvantum.
Depends on the usage though. While I prefer GTK over Qt as well, for me there are no GTK alternatives for Krita, Kate and Ghostwriter.
Consider adding the Dash To Panel extension. It was the polish Gnome was missing for me: https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/1160/dash-to-panel/
I'd also be a bit remiss if I didn't recommended WinTile, too: https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/1723/wintile-windows-10-window-tiling-for-gnome/
Great thanks!
use case of looking sharp?
It makes the OS and general interface more pleasant to look at and tickles the estethica oblongata.
You can be a cut above the rest!