this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
115 points (97.5% liked)

Ukraine

8192 readers
359 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Definitely not the moment to escalate the road rage

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Brake check to remind him of safety distance

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Curious how fast they were actually going

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As it's top speed is 42 mph, I suspect they had it going flat-out.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I paid for 42mph of speedometer, imma use 42 mph of speedometer.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Imma see if it'll flip when I hit 50!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

From what i know it can go faster theoretically but has a limiter to not break down fast.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

As the story goes the Swiss once tuned one to do 140km/h, made a break test, and had to send the crew to hospital. Without messing with the transmission to get higher ratios, well-maintained, optimally tensioned tracks etc. the maximum is about 90, more typically 80, the official maximum is 70. Soldiers are generally told to keep it under 60. Don't underestimate the centrifugal force of the tracks they're getting hard to control at high speeds.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They could have taken that off, I suppose.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Limits are for peacetime I bet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thats not as easy as it sounds probably, that tank is going 60km/h from what i looks.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which is about right. I, personally, wouldn't really fancy getting that bad boy up much higher.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I mean the limiter is there for a reason...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Too close for comfort. I don't know what the braking distance is but I doubt 60-70 tons of steel at up to 70 km/h are that easily stopped. If that truck had to suddenly do an emergency brake, then the tank would probably just roll over & flatten it, with everyone in and on it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm42sikiW3Y

If the crew reacts in time and really wants to stop, they can.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Fucking balls of steel.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t know what the braking distance is

At 70km/h, 20.6 metres. For ordinary cars it's ~50m.

In a nutshell, a tracked vehicle has quite a bit more contact area with the ground, it's also kind of hard to lift the rear wheels up so you can apply a lot of break force before you start to skid etc. And Leos have the hardware to actually do that, there's a retarder in the drive train and additional disc brakes.

Have side views on dirt and on tarmac.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wow, that's almost a full G of acceleration in a heavily armoured vehicle. Tracks are crazy. I wonder how hot the brake pads get in the process.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

"objects in mirror are closer than they appear"