this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
289 points (98.3% liked)

News

22896 readers
4052 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't understand why an AI match can't at least be vetted by an actual person more or less on the spot!

Like

Hey AI matched you as this criminal individual, are you this person

gives ID

Oh you're not that person, sorry our bad.

It's still not great but much better than this.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you seen cops? They'll use any excuse to lock someone up, they're not going to 'take the risk of letting a suspect go'.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah I am assuming a world where cops don't arrest black people because they feel like it lol

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Have you seen the false positives by police? They think all black people look alike too.

[–] SeaPancake 6 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"You match the description."

The description:

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I don't think you understand how it works. So the process is simple. a crime happens. the cops are called, they collect whatever surveillance video they can get, or maybe it was a cell phone camera, or something. they load it up to the AI software, which then runs it against government databases (probably driver's license photos) and maybe images on social media.

it was the initial identification that was off- and should have been entirely avoidable here: the guy lived in Georgia, and the warrant issued in Louisiana. or, you know. Three states away. It disproportionately impacts black people because the training data used was mostly with white people.

checking to see that they match the provided identification doesn't work because they never had a reliable ID to begin with. Chances are, any video of photos uploaded to get an id is going to be dogshit. Security camera DVR's usually prioritize holding for about 30 days, which either requires a shit load of storage or a whole lot of compression. And this assumes the cameras are even capable of 4k. or 1080p or 720p. and then you got problems like dust and dirt (especially if it's outside,) obscuring the camera, or bad lighting, or whatever it is happening too far away.

most times, you're really only going to be able to get a general description off security cameras "White male with brown hair and scruffy beard and about five-six". and that's on a good system. shitty systems set up in the 80's? that's going to be more like... "it was a person."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Because the entire point of AI is to remove human labor from the equation.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Facial recognition and AI are great tools to assist law enforcement.
Relying on them as sole sources of information is just stupid.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Facial recognition and AI are way to easy to abuse. It significantly out ways the benefits. This technology should be totally banned.

Especially AI. It will allow unprecedented and appalling levels of inequality. Like walled ghettos. Government AI scares the hell out of me

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

And being able to hide the usage by saying “a reliable informant …” should be criminal

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

The only way they will assist law enforcement in practice is giving the police and excuse to detain the wrong people.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

They should only be used if they are open source, and viewable by the public to be checked for biases and bugs. Unfortunately, they are mostly black box technology made by companies.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If only there were people who could have warned us. Oh wait.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone was warning us this was going on in China.

Funny how nobody holds the US government to the same standard as China's. Probably because there's a trade war going on and these fools don't realize how much propaganda they've sucked up to support it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Please link to the Chinese media reporting on it like this is then?

This is literally holding the US to the same standards? Or do you think the article is praising the tech?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The technology allows law enforcement agencies to feed images from video surveillance into software that can search government databases or social media for a possible match.

This alone should be enough to get people to stop using corporate social media

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Although this is likely from crawling, which would apply to any federated social media too once it becomes large enough to be on their radar.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Wait, everyone was telling me this only happened in China.

Huh. You mean it's okay for America to spy on its citizens but not the Chinese? I guess I am a stupid tool who doesn't realize there's a trade war going on and both nations pull the exact same shit with their populace as the other.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Just gotta start wearing masks in public.