"Met tries to distract from its own horrendous recent record, while pitching for yet more power to clamp down on whoever they feel like"
World News
Breaking news from around the world.
News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
For US News, see the US News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
49 rapes by ONE cop. Never forget.
I mean…good? People work with oil because it’s cheap. If protests are a way of making it costly, then it’s doing its job.
Why is the default thought to just “Wait until the protests are over”?
I want to say this makes me happy but who am I kidding, the Met's obviously saying this to justify demanding more police funding.
Well, just stop oil then :)
That's still got to be orders of magnitude less than the externalized costs of the oil companies in the same time period - even just counting the costs to the UK gov't and population.
Definitely - but that's 15% of the Mets budget. Screwed up as it is, it's also underfunded, and the result is that Londoners who are most affected by crime - predominantly low-income - will pay for this
Those are rookie numbers; gotta pump those numbers up.
Oh no... Anyway
I’m sure they can sell or loan of one or two stolen artifacts to pay for what amounts to a drop of money in their annual spending.