this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Guns for Leftists

1116 readers
31 users here now

For sharing and discussing about firearms.

Rules;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Statesian here. There are a CRAPTON of mass shootings here. If we do nothing about guns, the shootings will still happen. What is the leftist answer for reducing mass shootings without disarming the proletariat?

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

cracking down on the right-wing. seriously. the vast majority of US mass shootings that i can remember are done by violent white supremacists and fascists. the right is dangerous and will always use extreme and horrific violence to achieve their ways. so the leftist answer would be to suppress the activities and organizing of fascists heavily.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This. The circulation of fascist propaganda in particular must be curtailed and cracked down on to the greatest possible extent. Only a proletarian state can do this since a bourgeois state knowingly tolerates and cultivates fascism as a weapon against the working class and working class unity.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This.... Only a proletarian state can do this...

Sounds like not "This" at all? You don't agree with him. He's suggesting fixing it somehow within the current system.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I didn't read SU25 as saying that it could happen under the current state, just that that's the action that would need to be taken.

Edit - sorry, just realized this is an old thread. Feel free to ignore!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

of course the US government will never crack down on far-right terrorism, then they'd be stopping their own activities. this is purely just my leftist proposition of something that must happen to stop a lot of mass shootings. obviously, though, the US state is more interested in protecting the profits of the gun industry and the activities of the right. this would be an essential thing for a proletarian revolutionary state to do though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The fetishization of the second amendment by white reactionaries reveals the true intention, not as a check against a "tyrannical" government as its propagandized to be, but as a securing of settler dominance against Black and Native populations.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

the right trying to “stop tyranny” is like the body trying to stop its own heart from beating.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

The issue is mass shootings have become a part of American culture. Americans not only like killing brown people in other countries, but also themselves. I'm obviously overgeneralizing but it does hold true to at least some degree. The only real solution is a mass reeducation of Americans and that can only happen once the US itself is thrown into the dustbin of history.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There should be a distinction drawn between how the proletariat should be armed and how right-wingers want to be armed. The right in America uses guns as toys and an intimidation tactic against the poor. They're armed out of hatred and only care about their own guns, or perhaps that white people stay armed. American gun ownership, especially the 2A people, is an artifact from frontier justice, from slave catchers, lynching, all of that. It's disorganized, individualized, and fully absorbed within the capitalist framework.

The proletariat being armed implies for a purpose other than standard American gun ownership. We want liberation, we want to fight racism. So in that sense, gun ownership should be organized. Who commits mass shootings? Mostly disaffected white people who purchase a gun when they shouldn't have them.

I'd actually like to point to Switzerland's model of gun ownership. I know they're capitalist and imperialist and everything, but the gun ownership model is still interesting to me. You have to be involved in a militia there to have a gun. Guns and ammo belong to depots, so they're communally owned. You have to do regular training and drills to have access as well. So to have a gun you have to be part of something, you need training on how to use it, you need to be focused on using it for a specific purpose.

That's how the proletariat should be armed, in an organized way. We shouldn't be scared of restricting gun ownership based on purpose. They're not toys and shouldn't be bought and sold like toys. American gun culture is severely broken and downright frightening. It doesn't represent an armed working class at all. It's a disorganized mass, it's the working class pointing guns at themselves. Combined with a lack of social purpose it's like you said, a recipe for mass shootings.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

Also the Swiss only get access to rifles and such from the militia right? Not exactly the kind of weapon you can hide under your shirt.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
  • Invest more in mental health programs, including efforts to destigmatize therapy.
  • Teach critical thinking skills in school to give younger generations the tools to be more likely to find an alternative to violence.
  • Encourage more in-person social events and public spaces. It's too easy to dehumanize these days.
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've been thinking about your third bullet point a lot lately. I genuinely think that the lack of irl social interaction these days is far more pernicious than anyone wants to acknowledge. I don't think it's social media and technology that are the problem, rather, the LACK of third places and irl social interaction is the problem, if that makes sense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I went through online learning back in 2020 until early 2022 (Although this was probably justified due to the pandemic) and I can confirm that the lack of irl interaction (Combined with being overworked with constant online activities, where I had to work even during weekends to submit them on time) during online learning is what caused me so many problems and is what made me realize how shitty the status quo is, and that eventually radicalized me into becoming a ML, even if there were some bumps on the road. (although I overcame them by reading more theory)

While I still hold a personal grudge against the internet and (mainstream) social media, and have a desire to keep usage of it to a minimum, I agree that the technology itself isn't the problem. It is how it is used under Capitalism which is the problem. The internet has so much potential to connect and unite people for the better, but under Capitalism it isolates and alienates people. The internet could have been (and still could be) a great place to express human creativity and solidarity, but Capitalism has turned it into yet another place for consumerism and profit for the sake of profit, not to mention how corporations gather your online data and sell it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Maoist china had almost everyone with guns and i don't think school shootings happened

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

To be fair, there was relatively widespread banditry after Mao's death and before Deng's policies were put into effect. But that could be pinned to factors unrelated to guns themselves.